强制醜行罪를 둘러싼 몇 가지 문제점

• 영문명: A StudyonForcibleSexualAbuse
• 발행기관: 한국형사판례연구회
• 저자명: 이경재(LEE, KYUNG JAE)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사판례연구』형사판례연구 제23권, 165~196쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.06.30

영문 초록

In our criminal law system, rape and forcible sexual abuse are distinguished, and forcible sexual abuse and public obscenity are also different. Forcible sexual abuse is forcing undesired sexual behavior by one person upon another with force or threat. Nowadays, among some cases the meaning of force is interpreted willfully, so that even though one cannot see forcible sexual abuse, it seems to be the case. So it is advisable that the meaning of force is interpreted narrowly. There is no the offence of sexual abuse in public in our criminal law, but in special law(the Special Act of Sexual Assault) there is an offence of sexual abuse in public. But it is not good way to treat this problem, so it is advisable that the offence of sexual abuse without force should be introduced into the Criminal Act. In the Criminal Act even though sexual abuse and public obscenity is distinguished, the meaning of abuse similar to that of obscenity. To this a case said that the meaning of abuse is harm to one’s sexual determination, and obscenity is harm to public sexual morale.

목차

[대상판례 1] 대법원 2013.9.26. 선고 2013도5856 판결

[원심판결] 대전고법 2013.5.2. 선고 (청주) 2013노37 판결

[대상판례 2] 대법원 2011.8.18. 선고 2011도7344 판결

Ⅰ. 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. 형사법상 추행 관련 처벌규정

Ⅲ. 평가

Ⅳ. 강제추행죄의 구성요건에 대한 검토

Ⅴ. 단순추행죄의 신설 여부

Ⅵ. 추행과 음란 개념

Ⅶ. 맺음말

키워드

강제추행 추행 음란 공연음란 강간 forcible sexual abuse abuse public obscenity rape