한국어 수용성판단 자료의 학술지간 비교

• 영문명: A Comparison of Korean Acceptability Data in the Journals
• 발행기관: 한국생성문법학회
• 저자명: 안희돈(Ahn, Hee-Don) 조용준(Cho, Yongjoon)
• 간행물 정보: 『생성문법연구』제31권 제2호, 343~356쪽, 전체 14쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2021.05.30

영문 초록

The reliability of linguists’ introspective judgments of sentence acceptability has often been called into question. In this study we compare the large-scale replication studies conducted for published acceptability judgments given in the journals Linguistic Inquiry (Sprous et al. 2013), Studies in Generative Grammar (Cho et al. 2019) and Kwukehak ‘Korean Linguistics’. We make two observations about these replication studies. First, we note that English acceptability judgments in Linguistic Inquiry may be more reliable than Korean judgments in the other two journals. Secondly, the convergence rates between informal and formal judgment tasks in the journal Kwukehak are higher than those in the Studies in Generative Grammar, although both journals display significantly lower convergence rates than the Linguistic Inquiry. Our results may suggest that the peer review of Korean judgments in these journals may be insufficient or other factors may be involved.

목차

1. 서론

2. 연구 절차

3. 연구 결과와 논의

4. 결론

키워드

acceptability judgments formal and informal methods experimental syntax