- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 우세나
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제10권 제1호, 383~401쪽, 전체 19쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.05.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
The current Bankruptcy Law, adopting the exemption principle, discharges the responsibility of fulfilling debt obligations that the obligor is responsible for to-ward the creditor if the obligor fulfills certain conditions. Prior Bankruptcy Law Article 349 discharges the responsibility of all financial obligations and you can see that our Bankruptcy Law stipulates all exemption as an effect of exemption. In actual affairs, though, partial exemption is approved. However, if partial ex-emption is affirmed, doesn t it directly violate the principle of creditor equality that is presupposed in the bankruptcy procedures? Also, if partial exemption is approved to this extent, what can be the legal basis for it? While actual legal regulations clearly stipulate all exemption, how can the judiciary, with what ba-sis, approve partial exemption that contradicts the law? This paper, with the focus on these questions, will examine the possibilities and scope of partial exemption. First, it will examine the issue by concretizing and breaking down the concept of partial exemption. Furthermore, it will look into the comparative legal work as a form of investigating the possibilities of partial exemption. Next, to make the basis for the possibilities of partial exemp-tion, it will cite legal methodological and theoretical viewpoints. Finally, the pa-per will conclude after concretizing the scope of partial exemption.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 일부면책의 개념 분석
Ⅲ. 비교법적 고찰
Ⅳ. 우리 통합도산법상 일부면책의 가능성 및 그 범위
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!