- 영문명
- A study on the systematic position of international jurisdiction
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 이연주(Lee, Yeon Ju)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제18권 제1호, 9~40쪽, 전체 32쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2014.05.30

국문 초록
영문 초록
On systematic position of international jurisdiction(Internationalen Zuständigkeit), the common opinion understand the limit of jurisdiction(Gerichtsbarkeit) is made up with limits concerning subjects, objects and places, ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ is the limit of objects. The opposing opinion criticize that the common opinion dosen t distinguish between ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ and ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’. But the concept that ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ restrict ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’, premise ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ is different from ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’ basically. The systematic position of ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ in civil procedure law is down to the concept setting up of ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ and ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’, the systematic position of state immunity․diplomatic immunity etc. eventually. ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’ is the power which the whole people as the sovereignty of a nation delegate authority to the courts. Therefore ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’ is the concept about constitutional law which premise one sovereign nation. But ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ is the issue respecting distribute ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’ between nations, premising several nations. Therefore ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ is the concept about international law. In a view point of the history of state immunity and diplomatic immunity, ‘Capitulation’ and consular jurisdiction is divided into ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ and diplomatic immunity. Both don t make large difference except by legal source. According to these grounds, the opinion that systematic position of ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ and diplomatic immunity are different on terms with ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’, is unreasonable. In its final analysis, ‘Gerichtsbarkeit’, ‘Internationalen Zuständigkeit’ and state immunity․ diplomatic immunity have the three staged structure.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 국제재판관할의 의의
Ⅲ. 재판권과 국제재판관할의 관계
Ⅳ. 주권면제·외교적 면제와 국제재판관할의 관계
Ⅴ. 국제재판관할의 체계적 지위
Ⅵ. 소송요건으로서의 재판권, 주권면제·외교적 면제 및 국제재판관할
Ⅶ. 마치며
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
