- 영문명
- A Review of the Electronic Procedure Act – Focus on the Meaning of the term “Documents” and “Documentary Evidence” –
- 발행기관
- 한국민사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 임상혁(Ihm, Sahng Hyeog)
- 간행물 정보
- 『민사소송』제16권 제1호, 459~481쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.05.30

국문 초록
영문 초록
Korean judicature has been wildly publicizing the opening of the electronic litigation era as the “Act on the Use of Electronic Documents in Civil Procedures”(Electronic Procedure Act) takes effects on March 2010. This law means using electronic documents as well as paper documents in the court. Generally it is called the electronic filing system(electronic case management). Beyond this kind of territory, however, the article 13 of the act controls the area of documentary evidence, which causes considerable problems in current civil procedural system. The Civil Procedure Act make distinction between documents, paper files and written forms. But the newly made Electronic Procedure Act overgeneralize the meaning of documents, which means it defines every kinds of documents, for example, such as a special kind of document that works as an evidence. Furthermore, the act seems to include sound and image data into the documentary evidence erea. Beacuse that does not inflect the characteristic of document evidences at all, the best solution at the moment is to construe the article1 13 restrictly: the article1 is the provision about a form of the examination of evidence, That is supplementary regulation of the article 374 of the Civil Procedure Act, and the article 120 & 121 of Civil Procedure rules. And the concept of the “electronic document” on the article 2 of the Electronic Procedure Act should be confined to relation to the electronic filing system only.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 개념의 검토
Ⅲ. 서증과 문서
Ⅳ. 전자소송법과 증거조사
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
