도시개발사업의 사업방식별 리스크 요인의 상대적 중요도에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the Relative Importance of Risk Factors by Business Method of Urban Development Projects in Pyeongtaek City
• 발행기관: 한국주거환경학회
• 저자명: 이재성(Lee, Jae Sung) 성주한(Sung, Joo Han)
• 간행물 정보: 『주거환경(한국주거환경학회논문집)』住居環境 제18권 제2호 (통권 제48호), 147~166쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 지역개발
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2020.06.30

영문 초록

The purpose of this research is to examine the development risk factors through the step-by-step approach of urban development projects by project method, focusing on Pyeongtaek area. In the comparison by business method, the risk of only the exchange method is caused by problems in demand and supply that do not judge the business disruption and interest rate policy due to zoning without thorough feasibility review, and instability of the development project due to tax fluctuation, developer financial company, construction It was considered to be a signing of an agreement with and against adverse conditions. In other words, because the project implementer conducts the project without purchasing land according to the characteristics of the replotting method, it is because the zoning and cooperation with the business agency, financial company, and contractor are judged to be important. In addition, the risks of the adoption and use method are due to the inability to permit or delay due to the lack of review of the upper plan and the upper regulations, and the delay in the development business due to the lack of liquidity due to the loan regulation of the pre-sale due to the financial policy after the sale, and the wrong construction contract. saw. This is because the project operator takes a lot of funds in the early stages as a method of negotiation purchase or acceptance, and thus, when the project is prolonged due to incapacity or delay in licensing, changes in financial policy, and lack of liquidity, the effect of the risk factor is greatly affected. Because. Lastly, it was considered that the risk of mixed-use only was business disruption due to cancellation of designation due to incorrect designation and unforeseen unsold sale. In other words, because the business is conducted by classifying the installation cost of each infrastructure by designating it as a replotting method and a receiving method, many complaints are generated during the process, and if the project is canceled or delayed for a long time, the risk factor is greatly affected. Because it appears.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 평택시 도시개발사업의 사업방식별 리스크의 이론적 근거 및 선행연구

Ⅲ. 평택시 도시개발사업의 현황

Ⅳ. 실증연구

Ⅴ. 결 론

참고문헌

키워드

평택시 도시개발사업 표적집단심층면접 사업방식 계층분석기법 Pyeongtaek city Urban development project FGI(Focus group interview) Business methods AHP(Analytic hierarchy process)