- 영문명
- Current Status and Factors Affecting Prescription of Gastrointestinal Motility Drugs in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease
- 발행기관
- 대한약학회
- 저자명
- 이창훈(Chang Hoon Lee) 김시인(Siin Kim) 서혜선(Hae Sun Suh)
- 간행물 정보
- 『약학회지』제63권 제6호(2019년), 333~344쪽, 전체 12쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 기타의약학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2019.12.30

국문 초록
영문 초록
Gastrointestinal motility drugs have been prescribed to manage functional dyspepsia in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, anti-dopaminergic gastrointestinal motility drugs can exacerbate motor symptoms of PD. This study investigated the current use and factors affecting prescription of gastrointestinal motility drugs in PD patients. This retrospective cohort study extracted 3 patient groups (high-risk anti-dopaminergic drugs, low-risk anti-dopaminergic drugs and trimebutine group), by using the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort database. The most frequently prescribed drug was domperidone (n=437). Age and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were significantly different across three patient groups (p-value<0.05). Post hoc test (Tukey test) showed that high-risk group and trimebutine group were significantly different in age and CCI (p-value<0.05). The chi-square test for types of institution and clinical departments were significantly different across patient groups (p-value<0.001). Compared to tertiary hospital, general hospital [odds ratio (OR): 2.05, confidence interval (CI): 1.07-3.93], hospital/psychiatric hospital (OR: 4.28 CI: 2.11-8.65), and clinic (OR: 4.94 CI: 2.64-9.26) were more likely to prescribe high-risk drugs than low-risk drugs. Among clinical departments, neurology (OR: 0.08 CI: 0.05-0.14) was less likely to prescribe high-risk drugs than low-risk drugs. When comparing low-risk drugs group and trimebutine group, low-risk drugs were less likely to be prescribed in general hospital (OR: 0.40 CI: 0.18-0.92), hospital/psychiatric hospital (OR: 0.24 CI: 0.10-0.58), and clinic (OR: 0.16 CI: 0.08-0.36) than in tertiary hospital; Neurology (OR: 20.38 CI: 9.65-43.06) was more likely to prescribe low-risk drugs. Consequently, tertiary hospital and neurology were more likely to prescribe low-risk drugs than clinics and internal medicine, respectively.
목차
서 론(Introduction)
연구 방법(Research Methods)
결 과(Results)
고 찰(Discussion)
결 론(Conclusion)
감사의 말씀(Acknowledgment)
Conflict of Interest
References
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
