- 영문명
- Human Exposure to BTEX and Its Risk Assessment Using the CalTOX Model According to the Probability Density Function in Meteorological Input Data
- 발행기관
- 한국환경보건학회
- 저자명
- 김 옥(Ok Kim) 송영호(Youngho Song) 최진하(Jinha Choi) 박상현(Sanghyun Park) 박창용(Changyoung Park) 이민우(Minwoo Lee) 이진헌(Jinheon Lee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국환경보건학회지』제45권 제5호, 497~510쪽, 전체 14쪽
- 주제분류
- 공학 > 환경공학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2019.10.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
Objectives: The aim of this study was to secure the reliability of using the CalTOX model when evaluating LADD (or ADD) and Risk (or HQ) among local residents for the emission of BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylene) and by closely examining the difference in the confidence interval of the assessment outcomes according to the difference in the probability density function of input variables.
Methods: The assessment was made by dividing it according to the method (I†) of inputting the probability density function in meteorological variables of the model with log-normal distribution and the method of inputting (II‡) after grasping the optimal probability density function using @Risk. A T-test was carried out in order to analyze the difference in confidence interval of the two assessment results.
Results: It was evaluated to be 1.46E-03 mg/kg-d in LADD of Benzene, 1.96E-04 mg/kg-d in ADD of Toluene, 8.15E-05 mg/kg-d in ADD of Ethylbenzene, and 2.30E-04 mg/kg-d in ADD of Xylene. As for the predicted confidence interval in LADD and ADD, there was a significant difference between the I† and II‡ methods in LADDInhalation for Benzene, and in ADDInhalation and ADD for Toluene and Xylene. It appeared to be 3.58E-05 for risk in Benzene, 3.78E-03 for HQ in Toluene, 1.48E-03 for HQ in Ethylbenzene, and 3.77E-03 for HQ in Xylene. As a result of the HQ in Toluene and Xylene, the difference in confidence interval between the I† and II‡ methods was shown to be significant.
Conclusions: The human risk assessment for BTEX was made by dividing it into the method (I†) of inputting the probability density function of meteorological variables for the CalTOX model with log-normal distribution, and the method of inputting (II‡) after grasping the optimal probability density function using @Risk. As a result, it was identified that Risk (or HQ) is the same, but that there is a significant difference in the confidence interval of Risk (or HQ) between the I† and II‡ methods.
목차
I. 서 론
II. 연구 방법
III. 연구 결과
IV. 고 찰
V. 결 론
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!