Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)

• 발행기관: 한국생성문법학회
• 저자명: Hee-Don Ahn Sungeun Cho
• 간행물 정보: 『생성문법연구』제29권 제3호, 571~590쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.08.30

영문 초록

Ahn & Cho (2017a) suggests that multiple fragments consist of two clauses plus additional ellipsis. Two important claims are as follows. First, prior to ellipsis, the sentential source can be a syntactically and semantically complete answer to the question. Second, island violation is not repaired by ellipsis. Based on these, Ahn & Cho (2017a-c) account for ill-formed examples related to multiple fragments. Recently, Chung (2019) discusses problems that the bi-clausal analysis of multiple fragments may have. This squib critically reviews the defects pointed out by Chung (2019) and attempts to show that they are not real. This squib also provides further evidence for the no-repair-by-ellipsis analysis of multiple fragments in Korean.

목차

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Apparent Defects

3. Concluding Remarks

References

키워드

multiple fragments case-marked fragment caseless fragment copula construction bi-clause analysis