사법경찰관의 ‘1차적 수사종결권’의 법제화 방안

• 영문명: Legislation of Diversion Power of Judicial Police Officers
• 발행기관: 한국형사정책학회
• 저자명: 윤동호(Yun, Dong-Ho)
• 간행물 정보: 『형사정책』刑事政策 第30卷 第2號, 115~132쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2018.09.30

영문 초록

According to current law, judical police officers should transfer all criminal cases to public prosecutor after closing investigation. This is principle of mandatory transfer. So criminal justice agencies are overloaded. We are only focused on closing the case quickly and sending out it out of the procedure. It is an exit strategy. According to current law, police are the object of distrust. This paper insists that we should grant diversion power and trust to judical police officers. This diversion power means a discretionary power to release suspects. This can be compared to the discretionary power of prosecutor whether or not to prosecute. There are two types of police diversion. The one is principle of discretionary booking or charging criminal case. It is necessary to control the influx of criminal cases at the early stage of criminal procedure. Despite victim’s complaint, it is necessary to arrange for the police to autonomously judge whether or not to investigate criminal case. It is an entrance strategy. The other is principle of discretionary transfer. To strengthen the responsibility of investigation, it is necessary to arrange for the police to autonomously judge whether or not to send the case to the public prosecutors. It is principle of discretionary transferring criminal case to the public prosecutor.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제제기

Ⅱ. 사경의 불입건․불송치결정권의 형사절차상 의미

Ⅲ. 사경의 불입건․불송치결정권의 현행 사법체계 내지 법치국가원칙 침해 여부

Ⅳ. 사경의 불입건․불송치결정권의 법제화 방안

Ⅴ. 결론

키워드

사법경찰관 전건송치의무 송치재량주의 입건재량주의 입구전략 출구전략 훈방 Judicial Police Office Principle of mandatory transfe Principle of discretionary transfe Principle of discretionary booking or charging Entrance strategy Exit strategy Diversion power or discretionary power