공학교육인증 평가체제의 메타평가 준거 개발

• 영문명: The Development of the Meta-Evaluation Criteria for the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education in Korea
• 발행기관: 한국공학교육학회
• 저자명: 조옥경(Ok-Kyung Cho) 최금진(Keumjin Choi)
• 간행물 정보: 『공학교육연구』제16권 제3호, 28~41쪽, 전체 14쪽
• 주제분류: 공학 > 기타공학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.05.30

영문 초록

The purpose of this study was to develop the Meta-Evaluation Criteria which can comprehensively and systematically evaluate and improve the Accreditation Evaluation System for Engineering Education. This will provide useful implications for establishing value, direction, and improvement remedy for Engineering Educations Accreditation System of Korea. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, Meta-Evaluation Criteria was developed to comprehensively and systematically assess and analyze the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. The research methodology used to study these subjects: literature review, interviews with experts, Delphi survey (three times), survey, analysis of narrative opinion and secondary source. The results and conclusions of this study can be summarized as follows: First, the final Meta-Evaluation Criteria were developed so as to comprehensively and systematically assess and analyze the Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. The criteria s validity and reliability were also identified. Specific details are as follows: In a draft plan of the Meta-Evaluation Criteria, Meta-Evaluation concept was defined as evaluation on the whole range of Accreditation Evaluation System of Engineering Education. Meta-Evaluation Criteria was designed to be based on a systematic approach and applies the phased approach to the lower component to reflect evaluation s characteristics. Then validity and reliability of the developed draft plan was verified by calculating Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Degree of Consensus, Degree of Convergence and Cronbach s alpha. The final developed Meta-Evaluation Criteria obtaining validity and reliability were composed of 5 evaluation areas (environment, input, performance, result, utilization), 15 evaluation items, 68 evaluation indicators.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 이론적 배경

Ⅲ. 연구방법 및 절차

Ⅳ. 공학교육 인증평가의 메타평가 준거 개발

Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의, 제언

키워드

Accreditation of engineering education Meta-Evaluation Evaluation system