Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolated from food animals and raw meats in slaughterhouse in Korea during 2010
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
1:1 문의
국문 초록
영문 초록
Campylobacterosis is the most common food borne bacterial disease in many countries. Food animals and animal products are considered to be the reservoir of the Campylobacter species. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. from food animals and raw meats in slaughterhouses. A total of 90 Campylobacter jejuni (C. jejuni) and 127 Campylobacter coli (C. coli) were isolated, for which antimicrobial susceptibility was examined using broth dilution method. Resistance to macrolide antimicrobials was higher among C. coli isolates than among C. jejuni. Among both C. jejuni and C. coli isolates, the most frequently observed resistance was to nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline. No erythromycin resistance was observed among C. jejuni isolates from cattle, pig and beef. However, 28.3% (n=13) and 25% (n=3) of C. coli isolates from pigs and pork showed resistance to erythromycin, respectively. The predominant profile of multiple resistance among C. jejuni and C. coli isolates was ciprofloxacin/tetracycline/nalidixic acid resistance (46.7%) and ciprofloxacin/nalidixic acid resistance (31.5%), respectively. This finding has important implication for food safety and public health.
채명화(Myung Hwa Chae),남향미(Hyang Mi Nam),장금찬(Geum Chan Jang),김혜지(Hae Ji Kim),김수란(Su Ran Kim),정석찬(Suk Chan Jung),강대진(Dae Jin Kang),김준걸(Joon Kul Kim),임숙경(Suk Kyung Lim). (2011).2010년 가축 및 도축장 식육에서 분리한 Campylobacter jejuni와 Campylobacter coli의 항생제 내성. Korean Journal of Veterinary Public Health, 35 (4), 239-245
MLA
채명화(Myung Hwa Chae),남향미(Hyang Mi Nam),장금찬(Geum Chan Jang),김혜지(Hae Ji Kim),김수란(Su Ran Kim),정석찬(Suk Chan Jung),강대진(Dae Jin Kang),김준걸(Joon Kul Kim),임숙경(Suk Kyung Lim). "2010년 가축 및 도축장 식육에서 분리한 Campylobacter jejuni와 Campylobacter coli의 항생제 내성." Korean Journal of Veterinary Public Health, 35.4(2011): 239-245