- 영문명
- A Study on Modification & Termination of the Contract for the Public Interest in Government Procurement Contracts
- 발행기관
- 중앙대학교 법학연구원
- 저자명
- 전현철(Jun, Hyun Cheol)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第41輯 第1號, 229~267쪽, 전체 39쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2017.04.30

국문 초록
영문 초록
It is the basic principle of law that contracts must be followed. But it is necessary to accept the contract m odification and the contract term ination according to the public interest in the adm inistrative procurem ent contract. Therefore, in the case of contract modification or termination according to the public interest in governm ent procurem ent contracts, it is necessary to approach from the view point of the rule of just com pensation for the law ful taking of property by the pow er of em inent dom ain rather than contract theory in the judicial law .
If there is a need for public interest in governm ent procurem ent contracts, the governm ent m ay unilaterally term inate the contract. In the U nited States, it perm its the term ination of convenience contracts if policies are changed, such as to prevent unnecessary spending or loss, or to w ithdraw projects for budget cuts. Therefore, it is reasonable to acknow ledge the m odification and term ination of the contract for public interest in the case that the factual or legal status on w hich the contract originally originated is significantly changed or in the case of force m ajeure such as natural disasters occurs.
Even if a contract m odification or term ination for public benefit is allow ed, it should be considered contract m odification first and used contract term ination as a last resort. If the contract is term inated, just com pensation shcompensation should, in principle, fully compensate the objective value of the damaged property, but it may be less if reasonable. Therefore, in the case of contract termination for the public interest, it restricts the other party s recovery to costs incurred, profit on w ork done, and costs of preparing the term ination settlem ent proposal. Recovery of anticipated profit is precluded. If the com pensation of the expected profit is allow ed, the term ination of the contract for the public interest m ay becom e m eaningless.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 현행 법령상의 규정
Ⅲ. 비교법적인 검토
Ⅳ. 공익을 위한 계약의 변경 및 해지제도의 확립
Ⅴ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
