통신정보보관제도의 정당성

• 영문명: The Lawfulness of Data Retention from the Judgement of by the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Austrian Constitutional Court
• 발행기관: 중앙대학교 법학연구원
• 저자명: 민영성(Min Young Sung) 박희영(Park Hee Young)
• 간행물 정보: 『법학논문집』法學論文集 第40輯 第1號, 449~473쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2016.04.30

영문 초록

The Data Retention Directive(DRD) of EU(2006/24/EC) obliges the Member States to retain all the communication data(traffic data, location data, ect.) of users accumulated in connection with telecommunication or internet communication from the date of communication for at least six months and a maximum of two years independently of any suspicion for the fight against serious criminal offences such as terrorism. The Court of Justice of the European Union(CJEU) and the Austrian Constitutional Court (VfGH) declared the Data Retention Directive to be invalid because its related provisions violated the fundamental rights. However the both Courts consider that the DRD may be justified if it can meet the proportionality regarding data retention and access. The regulations about Data Retention in Korea relate to Article 13, 15-2 of the Protection of Communications Secrets Act(Act No. 12229, Jan. 14, 2014), Article 21-4 of its Enforcement Decree. The outcome of the analysis about the austrian provisions regarding Data Retention shows that korean concerning regulations may not satisfy the criteria of the judgement of CJEU and the VfGH. A detailed research thereof should be required.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. EU 통신정보보관지침과 오스트리아의 이행 법률

1. EU 통신정보보관지침

2. 오스트리아의 이행 법률

3. 오스트리아 헌법재판소의 선결 요청

Ⅲ. 유럽사법재판소 무효 판결

1. 관련 기본권

2. 이유

Ⅳ. 오스트리아 헌법재판소의 위헌 판결

1. 관련 기본권

2. 이유

Ⅴ. 한국 통신비밀보호법 상 통신사실확인자료 보관 및 요청의 정당성

1. 통신사실확인자료 보관 및 요청

2. 유럽사법재판소 및 오스트리아 헌법재판소 판결 기준의 적용

Ⅵ. 결론

키워드

통신정보보관지침 2006/24/EC 개인정보보호 트래픽데이터 통신사실확인자료 Data Retention Directive 2006/24/EC data retention(Vorratsdatenspeicherung) traffic data (Verkehrsdataen) communication confirmation data