비접촉 안압계, 리바운드 안압계, 토노펜, 골드만 압평안압계의 안압 비교

• 영문명: Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Non-Contact Tonometer, Rebound Tonometer, Tono-Pen, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 이경식 김세경 김응권 김태임,Kyung Sik Lee, MD, Se Kyung Kim, MD, Eung Kweon Kim, MD, PhD, Tae Im Kim, MD, PhD
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume55,number1, 47~53쪽, 전체 7쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 의학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.01.15

영문 초록

Purpose: To compare the level of accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements attained by non-contact tonometer (NCT), rebound tonometer (RT) Icare^{®, and Tono-Pen (TONO-PEN AVIA®), using Goldmann Applanation tonometer (GAT) as a reference value and to explore their clinical usefulness. Methods: In a prospective study of 71 normal eyes, IOP was measured with NCT, RT, Tono-Pen and GAT. The IOP values of were then compared between the eyes. Results: RT showed statistically most significant agreement with the GAT [ICC 0.811, 95%CI 0.712-0.878]. In analysis of Bland-Altman plots, NCT showed the smallest mean bias (+0.2 mm Hg) and widest CI (95%CI; ±5.05 mm Hg), RT showed relatively small mean bias (-0.7 mm Hg) and narrowest CI (95%CI; ±3.75 mm Hg). Conclusions: There was a significant agreement between the RT and the GAT measurements. We expect RT to be considered as a reliable alternative when IOP measurement with GAT is not feasible. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2014;55(1):47-53}

키워드

Goldmann applanation tonometer, Rebound tonometer