서로 다른 세가지 비구면 일체형 인공수정체 삽입 수술 후 임상 결과의 비교

• 영문명: Comparisons of Clinical Results after Implantation of Three Aspheric Intraocular Lenses
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 이가현 윤명헌 서경률 김응권 김태임,Kahyun Lee, MD, Myung Hun Yoon, MD, Kyoung Yul Seo, MD, PhD, Eung Kweon Kim, MD, PhD, Tae-im Kim, MD, PhD
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume54,number8, 1213~1218쪽, 전체 6쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 의학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.08.15

영문 초록

Purpose: To compare the clinical 3 months postoperative results of three different 1-piece aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs): AcrySof IQ SN60WF (Alcon Laboratories, INC, Fort Worth, TX), TECNIS 1-piece ZCB00 (AMO Inc., Santa Ana, CA) and the newly developed enVista MX60 (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY). Methods: In a total of 62 eyes, 1 of the 3 1-piece aspheric IOLs, AcrySof IQ SN60WF, TECNIS 1-piece ZCB00 or enVista MX60 was implanted after cataract extraction. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and spherical equivalent were assessed 3 months postoperatively. Total spherical aberration, high order aberration, and modulation transfer function were analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences of UCVA, BCVA, the accuracy of postoperative refractive power, and modulation transfer function among the 3 IOLs. Higher order aberrations of the entire eye and internal optics showed almost no significant differences. Conclusions: The newly developed IOL, enVista MX60, showed equivalent clinical outcomes as both AcrySof IQ SN60WF and TECNIS 1-piece ZCB00.

키워드

Aspheric intraocular lens, Spherical aberration