본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

자동각막굴절계, IOL Master, 각막지형도의 각막굴절력 및 각막난시 측정의 비교 분석

이용수 3

영문명
Comparative Analysis of Corneal Refraction and Astigmatism Measured with Autokeratometer, IOL Master, and Topography
발행기관
대한안과학회
저자명
한정모 최혁진 김미금 위원량 이진학,Jeong Mo Han, MD,, Hyuk Jin Choi, MD,, Mee Kum Kim, MD,, Won Ryang Wee, MD,, Jin Hak Lee, MD,
간행물 정보
『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume52,number12, 1427~1433쪽, 전체 7쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 역사학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.12.15
이용가능 이용불가
  • sam무제한 이용권 으로 학술논문 이용이 가능합니다.
  • 이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다. 1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Purpose: To comparatively analyze the repeatability and consistency between different methods of measuring corneal refraction and astigmatism in order to precisely determine the toric intraocular lens target. Methods: The medical records of 254 eyes of 192 persons were retrospectively reviewed to compare the repeatability of corneal refraction measured with autokeratometer, IOL Master, and topography. The axis and the amount of the astigmatism were compared between these methods. The differences between the estimated spherical equivalents using measured corneal refractive values and the actual spherical equivalents after cataract surgery were compared to evaluate the expected astigmatic error of each measurement. Results: The average corneal refraction was greater with topography than with IOL Master or autokeratometer. Astigmatism calculated with IOL Master was greater than that measured with topography or autokeratometer. The mean coefficient of variation for mean corneal refraction was 0.19% with autokeratometer, which was smaller than that with IOL Master or topography. In patients with more than 1.5D of astigmatism, there were no significant differences in the axis measured by each instrument. The expected spherical error in IOL calculation was smaller with the measured values from IOL Master and autokeratometer than were those with topography. Conclusions: The repeatability of measurements for corneal refraction and astigmatism was significantly higher using the autokeratometer and IOL Master, with the highest astigmatic value observed with the IOL master. The axis of astigmatism for each method was consistent in the patients with more than 1.5D of astigmatism. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2011;52(12):1427-1433

목차

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

한정모,최혁진,김미금,위원량,이진학,Jeong Mo Han, MD,, Hyuk Jin Choi, MD,, Mee Kum Kim, MD,, Won Ryang Wee, MD,, Jin Hak Lee, MD,. (2011).자동각막굴절계, IOL Master, 각막지형도의 각막굴절력 및 각막난시 측정의 비교 분석. 대한안과학회지, 52 (12), 1427-1433

MLA

한정모,최혁진,김미금,위원량,이진학,Jeong Mo Han, MD,, Hyuk Jin Choi, MD,, Mee Kum Kim, MD,, Won Ryang Wee, MD,, Jin Hak Lee, MD,. "자동각막굴절계, IOL Master, 각막지형도의 각막굴절력 및 각막난시 측정의 비교 분석." 대한안과학회지, 52.12(2011): 1427-1433

sam 이용권 선택
님이 보유하신 이용권입니다.
차감하실 sam이용권을 선택하세요.