人物性 同論의 근대적 전개

• 영문명: The Clue and Development of Modernity within Mibalsimchesunseonron
• 발행기관: 순천향대학교 인문학연구소
• 저자명: 안영상(Young-Sang Ahn)
• 간행물 정보: 『순천향 인문과학논총』23권, 135~170쪽, 전체 35쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 기타인문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.04.30

영문 초록

This Article is to research metaphysical logic structure and intellectual historical meaning on Yi Gan(李柬)'s Mibalsimchesunseonron(未發心體純善 論 : not yet concrete phase of mind-pure good-theory). First of all, his most important argument is that there existed a difference between deep mibal as reaching equilibrium of milal(中低未發, 未發之中) and superficial mibal as not reaching equilibrium of milal(不中底未發). To extend this logic, he defined deep mibal as fundamental mind(本然之心), superficial mibal as material force mind(氣質之心). Moreover, he insisted that fundamental mind revealed fundamental nature(本然之性), material force mind revealed material force nature(氣質之性). In other words, because all of humane beings have not only a fundamental nature but also a fundamental mind which is called innate pure good mind, and all human beings have equal ability to become sage. By the way, Han Won jin(韓元震) criticized Yi Gan's fundamental mind revealing fundamental nature as Buddhism or Yangming study, because Yi Gan's theory implied emphasis on the value of mind more than nature. However, Hong Jik phil(洪直弼) supported Yi Gan's theory as Zhu xi study and recriticized Han Won jin's critic of Yi Gan. As matter of fact, to compare Yi Gan with Nie bao(聶豹) who emphasized equilibrium of milal (未發之中) in the Yangming school, and although Yi Gan's theoretical system is different from Nie Bao's, there is similarity of emphasis on getting freedom of inner mind. Through the medium of Hong Jik phil, Yi Gan's theory is inherited and developed by Choi Lim(崔林) who is the supposed teacher of Choi Che u (崔濟愚) a well known founder of Donghak(東學). And Choi Che u declared that the dignity and equality of humane being was through the literary and missionary work. At that point, it is estimated that his thought has implication of modernity.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 이간의 심성일치론의 논리적 구조

Ⅲ. 한원진의 비판과 홍직필의 옹호로 본 이간 사상의 특징

Ⅳ. 섭표와 비교해 본 이간 사상의 특징

Ⅴ. 동학과의 관계에서 본 이간 사상

Ⅵ. 맺음말

참고문헌

ABSTRACT

키워드

Yi Gan Mibalsimchesunseonron fundamental mind Choi Lim Choi Che u Yangming study Donghak modernity 李柬 未發心體純善論 本然之心 崔林 崔濟愚 陽明學 東學