SPS 분쟁 해결에 적용 가능한 심사기준의 정립 가능성

• 영문명: Applicability of Appropriate Standard of Review to SPS Disputes: Focusing on Australia-Apples Case
• 발행기관: 한국무역연구원
• 저자명: 이주영(Ju-Young Lee) 이은섭(Eun-Sup Lee) 오병석(Byung-Seok Ok) 김선옥(Sun-Ok Kim) 이양기(Yang-Kee Lee) 박원형(Won-Hyung Park)
• 간행물 정보: 『무역연구』제9권 제6호, 495~510쪽, 전체 16쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.11.30

영문 초록

The problem of the applicable standard of review in sanitary and phytosanitary(SPS) disputes has recently become an important issue in the legal discussion. The standard of review may vary from de novo review to full deference. Under de novo review, a superior body is able to review all kinds of determinations made by an inferior body and substitute them with its own. A fully deferencial standard restricts reviewing powers of a superior body, which may only check the procedural compliance without interfering with the substantive determinations of lower body. On the international lever, the standard of review plays a similar function. It determines, alongside the substantive obligations, a distribution of powers between national governments and international bodies. Arising necessity of consistent standard of review since referring of 'standard of review' in EC-Hom10nes case, this paper will review provisions at issue in SPS disputes and then, examine tendency of standard of review which gradually changes. Finally, this paper will explore applicability of single standard of review through examining Australia-Apples, the latest SPS dispute.

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. SPS 분쟁에서의 쟁점 사안에 적용된 심사기준 검토

Ⅲ. Australia-Apple 사건의 판결분석을 통한 최근 심사 경향

Ⅳ. SPS협정에 적용 가능한 심사기준의 정립 가능성

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

standard of review deference de novo review risk assessment Australia-Apples case SPS Agreement