부동산 경매에 있어서 유치권의 효력 범위에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the Effective Scope of a Lien in Real Property Auction
• 발행기관: 한국부동산학회
• 저자명: 이춘원(Lee, Choon Won)
• 간행물 정보: 『부동산학보』不動産學報 第43輯, 21~44쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.12.30

영문 초록

1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVE Even though a lien under law has only effect of retention, the civil execution act takes on abernahmeprinzip with respect to a lien and thus practically, in the procedure of payment, a lien takes priority over a mortgage which was established before such lien. In order words, even though a lien was established against any object to be executed in the civil execution procedure, a mortgagee or other common creditor has no any restriction on execution of real property, but cannot take over real property obtained by a successful bid auction. Therefore, since it is equivalent to the effect of recognition of a lien holders as having top priority right of payment, a mortgagee who has pre-established security, or a creditor who has made a provisional attachment or attachment may encounter unexpected loss. In other to prevent such loss or damage, it is necessary to limit counterforce of a lien. (2) RESEARCH METHOD This study conduct a research in a method of legal interpretation theory through literature investigation and case analysis. (3) RESEARCH FINDINGS The reason that the civil execution law has adopted 'abernahmeprinzip' might be because it kept in mind in the concept of a lien as receivable increasing value of property. Therefore, it is necessary to take a different position on 'receivable embodying exchange value of property itself. In order words, since receivable for construction payment might contribute to the increase of the value of retained property, such receivable need to have a priority over pre-established mortgagee. However, since a lien for any receivable embodying exchange value, such as a right to claim a return of payment, has a similar nature to a mortgage, both are in the position of competition or contrast. 2. RESULTS Given the fact a lien us acknowledged for fairness, it is also necessary to determine whether counterforce of a lien can be acknowledged or not, in the aspect of fairness. In addition, through typical consideration, it is necessary to take a different positions between 'receivable increasing the value of property', such as receivable for construction payment, and 'receivable embodying exchange value of property itself. such as a right to claim a return of transaction payment. There is a case where it is permissible to claim a lien to a debtor but it is not permissible to claim a lien to persons other than a debtor. In such case, it is desirable to hand this issue by limiting the scope of parties who can claim a lien, rather than negating the establishment of a lien. This issue has been addressed in terms of 'correlation' as one of requirements of established of a lien, but is should be addressed in terms of the effective scope of a lien.

목차

I. 서

II. 유치권의 입법례와 민법상 유치권

III. 매각절차에서 유치권자와 이해관계인의 관계

IV. 결 어

<참고문헌>

키워드

인수주의 유치권 권리신고 압류 최우선변제 abernahmeprinzip lien notice on a right attachment top-priority payment