- 영문명
- A Case study on 'Restitution of unjust enrichment' and 'Res judicate' about estimation of Indemnity if the situation is changed after the automobile accident victim had an agreement
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 조규성(Cho, Gyu Seong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第27卷 第1號, 131~156쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this essay is to consider the legal aspects of ‘Res judicate’ about change of the situation after the automobile accident victim had an agreement. Generally a contract of automobile insurance is contract whereby the insurer undertakes to indemnity the assured, in manner and to extent thereby agreed, against losses of the assured occur during possession, use, management with the insured car. Here the word 'indemnity' means, literally, to save from loss or harm and, accordingly, 'indemnity' means he protection or security against damage or loss. If a car accident victims have agreed the insurer, the later additional damages can not claim to the insurer in principle. But The Supreme Court has recognized exceptions to the additional charge. That is to say, the car accident victims are the plants and sister state, if they survive longer than expected life, the insurer has been paid additional indemnity. The reason is that 'Res judicate' of previous litigation don't affect later litigation. This case is that the car accident victims must return already received compensation, if they died early than expected life. The Supreme Court has denied them. I think that this conclusion is wrong. Because this supreme court judgement inclined to admit the range of 'Res judicate' narrowly, and is placed with the past decisions. So this judgement are violated 'equity'. So I oppose to the Final Judgement because confuses legal judgement about ''Res judicate'.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 판결의 내용
Ⅲ. 판례 평석
Ⅳ. 맺는말
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!