- 영문명
- The Presidential Impeachment and the Original Intent
- 발행기관
- 한국아메리카학회
- 저자명
- 조지형(Ji-Hyung Cho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『미국학논집』제36집 3호, 324~355쪽, 전체 32쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 기타인문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.12.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study examines the Framers" original intent in structuring the Presidential impeachment. It inquires into the necessity of Presidential impeachment, the location of the impeachment power, and the scope of the impeachable offences. For the Framers and Ratifiers, impeachment was one of the most important means to realize the constitutional principles of separated powers and its system of checks and balances.
The Framers and Ratifiers believed that impeachment was not indispensable only by the fallibility of those who chose, but also by the corruptibility of the man chosen. They also believed that Presidential impeachment was indispensable for defending the Constitution against the President"s incapacity, corruption, or betrayal of the popular trust. They were keenly aware of the dangers of the impeachment process that would make the President a mere creature of the legislature and that it would destroy the fundamental principle of separated powers. Nevertheless, they agreed that the Presidential impeachment should be proceeded by the Congress since they were so sure that the people were King.
The "other high crimes and misdemeanors" were not necessarily limited to indictable crimes. The delegates in the Constitutional Convention and state ratifying conventions seemed to regard the impeachable offences as essentially "political crimes." No one could have echoed such sentiments more than Alexander Hamilton. The Framers and Ratifiers deliberately wrote in the imprecise words since they believed that the injuries to the constitutional principles and society could be so fundamental or broad. Therefore, subsequent generations are left to fill in the blanks on a case-by-case basis.
The Framers and Ratifiers believed that impeachment was not indispensable only by the fallibility of those who chose, but also by the corruptibility of the man chosen. They also believed that Presidential impeachment was indispensable for defending the Constitution against the President"s incapacity, corruption, or betrayal of the popular trust. They were keenly aware of the dangers of the impeachment process that would make the President a mere creature of the legislature and that it would destroy the fundamental principle of separated powers. Nevertheless, they agreed that the Presidential impeachment should be proceeded by the Congress since they were so sure that the people were King.
The "other high crimes and misdemeanors" were not necessarily limited to indictable crimes. The delegates in the Constitutional Convention and state ratifying conventions seemed to regard the impeachable offences as essentially "political crimes." No one could have echoed such sentiments more than Alexander Hamilton. The Framers and Ratifiers deliberately wrote in the imprecise words since they believed that the injuries to the constitutional principles and society could be so fundamental or broad. Therefore, subsequent generations are left to fill in the blanks on a case-by-case basis.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 탄핵의 대상과 대통령
Ⅲ. 탄핵 심판과 탄핵 사유
Ⅳ. 헌법비준회의와 탄핵 옹호론
Ⅴ. 결론
인용 문헌
Abstract
Ⅱ. 탄핵의 대상과 대통령
Ⅲ. 탄핵 심판과 탄핵 사유
Ⅳ. 헌법비준회의와 탄핵 옹호론
Ⅴ. 결론
인용 문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!