- 영문명
- A Study on the Writing Periods of Nam-Yüeh Hui-Ssu’s Works Fa-hua-ching an-lo-hsing-i and Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men : With Emphasis on the Differences of Thoughts
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 이병욱(Lee Byung-Wook)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제19호, 225~257쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.04.30
 
        국문 초록
영문 초록
  In this paper, I tried to prove that Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men(諸法無諍三昧法門) was written later than Fa-hua-ching an-lo-hsing-i (法華經安樂行義) by comparing their contents.
At first, I compared his interpretation of an-lo-hsing (安樂行) in Fahua-ching an-lo-hsing-i with that of ch’an-po-lo-mi (禪波羅密) in Chufa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men. Nam-Y?eh Hui-Ssu (南岳慧思) presented san-jen (三忍) to explain the meaning of an-lo-hsing. San-jen are chungsheng-jen (衆生忍), fa-hsing-jen (法性忍) and fa-chieh-hai shen-t’ungjen (法界海神通忍). He interpreted chung-sheng-jen and fa-hsingjen among them as having three meanings. Those three meanings of chung-sheng-jen and fa-hsing-jen correspond to san-chih (三智) of Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men. San-chih are tao-chih (道智), tao chung-chih (道種智) and i-ch’ieh-chung-chih (一切種智). But fa-chieh-hai shen-t’ung-jen was not interpreted in terms of the three meanings. This is an example that he had not yet establish his viewpoint in Fahua-ching an-lo-hsing-i.
Secondly, I compared his interpretations of ssu-nien-ch’u (四念處) in Fa-hua-ching an-lo-hsing-i and in Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men. In Fahua-ching an-lo-hsing-i, Nam-Y?eh Hui-Ssu interpreted ssu-nien-ch’ u as ssu-mo (四魔). But in Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men he presented more sophisticated interpretation of ssu-nien-ch’u as san-chih. Therefore I think that ssu-nien-ch’u of Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men was more advanced than that in Fa-hua-ching an-lo-hsing-i.
                    At first, I compared his interpretation of an-lo-hsing (安樂行) in Fahua-ching an-lo-hsing-i with that of ch’an-po-lo-mi (禪波羅密) in Chufa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men. Nam-Y?eh Hui-Ssu (南岳慧思) presented san-jen (三忍) to explain the meaning of an-lo-hsing. San-jen are chungsheng-jen (衆生忍), fa-hsing-jen (法性忍) and fa-chieh-hai shen-t’ungjen (法界海神通忍). He interpreted chung-sheng-jen and fa-hsingjen among them as having three meanings. Those three meanings of chung-sheng-jen and fa-hsing-jen correspond to san-chih (三智) of Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men. San-chih are tao-chih (道智), tao chung-chih (道種智) and i-ch’ieh-chung-chih (一切種智). But fa-chieh-hai shen-t’ung-jen was not interpreted in terms of the three meanings. This is an example that he had not yet establish his viewpoint in Fahua-ching an-lo-hsing-i.
Secondly, I compared his interpretations of ssu-nien-ch’u (四念處) in Fa-hua-ching an-lo-hsing-i and in Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men. In Fahua-ching an-lo-hsing-i, Nam-Y?eh Hui-Ssu interpreted ssu-nien-ch’ u as ssu-mo (四魔). But in Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men he presented more sophisticated interpretation of ssu-nien-ch’u as san-chih. Therefore I think that ssu-nien-ch’u of Chu-fa wu-cheng san-mei fa-men was more advanced than that in Fa-hua-ching an-lo-hsing-i.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 『법화경안락행의』 안락행과 『제법무쟁삼매법문』의선바라밀의 비교
Ⅲ. 『법화경안락행의』와 『제법무쟁삼매법문』에 나타난 사념처 비교
Ⅳ. 결론
	                       
                    	Ⅱ. 『법화경안락행의』 안락행과 『제법무쟁삼매법문』의선바라밀의 비교
Ⅲ. 『법화경안락행의』와 『제법무쟁삼매법문』에 나타난 사념처 비교
Ⅳ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
					교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
									
						 
					
				
			신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
						지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
 
					 
        