- 영문명
- Literary Works and Theories As Interweaving
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- Sang-Koo Kim
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제12권 2호, 197~209쪽, 전체 13쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
In this paper, I will prove that literary theories originate from literary works. In order to support it, I will examine literary theorists" literary concepts, literary theories, and narratology. They are Auerbach, Booth, James, Scholes, Kellogg, Barthes, and Frye. The common fact is for them literary theories are drawn from Western literary works, even from Bible.
In particular, collage and montage are essential for the literary strategies or devices. These are Derrida"s montage, Benjamin"s allegory, and Serres"s parasite. As for these whole relationships, literary theories and literary works are on the same way, although they have their own way to explore.
Also for the relationship of philosophical thoughts and imaginations to literary works, Deleuze sets up the significant meaning of nonsense, referring to Lewis"s Alice in Wonderland. He emphasizes nonsense instead of sense in order to solve the paradoxes of things. He draws his metaphysics of nonsense from a literary book. Blanchot also relates his neutre writing to "The Gaze of Orpheus," and proposes it as his literary and linguistic construction for the exploration of the origin of the literary work. Bataille"s transgression is the same as the work of Blanchot"s neutre.
As philosophical concepts have such relationship with literature, so are systems theory, field theory, and chaos theory necessary for literature. All literature is not proper for that.
Some literature has other objectives with the help of such theories. In such a case, literature and theories have the same goal, that is, the same exploration of the ultimate truth by way of the relationship of complementarity of literature and theories.
In particular, collage and montage are essential for the literary strategies or devices. These are Derrida"s montage, Benjamin"s allegory, and Serres"s parasite. As for these whole relationships, literary theories and literary works are on the same way, although they have their own way to explore.
Also for the relationship of philosophical thoughts and imaginations to literary works, Deleuze sets up the significant meaning of nonsense, referring to Lewis"s Alice in Wonderland. He emphasizes nonsense instead of sense in order to solve the paradoxes of things. He draws his metaphysics of nonsense from a literary book. Blanchot also relates his neutre writing to "The Gaze of Orpheus," and proposes it as his literary and linguistic construction for the exploration of the origin of the literary work. Bataille"s transgression is the same as the work of Blanchot"s neutre.
As philosophical concepts have such relationship with literature, so are systems theory, field theory, and chaos theory necessary for literature. All literature is not proper for that.
Some literature has other objectives with the help of such theories. In such a case, literature and theories have the same goal, that is, the same exploration of the ultimate truth by way of the relationship of complementarity of literature and theories.
목차
Ⅰ. Why Do I Say Interweaving?
Ⅱ. Interrelationship of Philosophy to Literary Works
Ⅲ. Literature Peered into through Other Disciplines: Why Are Theories of Other Disciplines Necessary?
Ⅳ. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract
Ⅱ. Interrelationship of Philosophy to Literary Works
Ⅲ. Literature Peered into through Other Disciplines: Why Are Theories of Other Disciplines Necessary?
Ⅳ. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!