- 영문명
- The Intertextuality in Seoul 1964 Winter and Seoul 1986 Summer
- 발행기관
- 어문연구학회
- 저자명
- 신익호(Ik-ho Shin)
- 간행물 정보
- 『어문연구』語文硏究 第55輯, 443~471쪽, 전체 29쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 한국어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30

국문 초록
영문 초록
In this paper, I analyze the narration, the narrative structure and the recognition of the reality from the point of view of the intertextuality in Seoul 1964 Winter and Seoul 1986 Summer. The former develops what Kim sees and experiences from the point of view of his observer narration without any special narrator. He doesn"t try the explanation of the situation but shows the lethargy and the oppression. It doesn"t show any dramatic reversal caused by the conflict structure. With the simple and narrative structure from beginning to end, it is focused on the crisis resulted from the isolation and the loneliness throughout the amusing but deconstructive discourse. The main characters" meaningless conversation causes the alienation and reflects the modern people"s lethargy, the life without direction, the social feature to value the material and the indifference of modern society. They have the sense of emptiness of spiritual value caused by the materialism of the industrial society in 1960s, and try to avoid the oppression of the reality without the distinct purpose.
Seoul 1986 Summer doesn"t have suicide scene, which is different from Seoul 1964 Winter. People can find the former parodies the latter because of several similar things between two books. First, they have the same plot in which two main characters happen to meet and talk in a snack stall, go to inn together and say goodbye to each other next day. Second, they develop the simple story without any dramatic conflict. Third, they use the images related to “wriggle” and "appearance“. Fourth, they have similar conversation, situation and title. The writer of Seoul 1986 Spring narrates the character"s ideal and emotion as an outward observer. It includes the close description, the narrative sentences, the sensible style, the unique nuance and many new vocabulary. Compared with the simple and plain structure in Seoul 1964 Winter, it has the narrative structure and various frameworks including teleportation, focus on description, overlap of the reality and the inside consciousness and change of the main character"s personality.
Today, the violence in the system incapacitates and weakens the modern people"s power under the pretext of law, ideology and government power. The public accept it to secure the established right and be satisfied with the reality, instead of fighting against it. Dongsoo Kim who got accustomed to be lethargic, recognizes the subjecthood and faces the reality with the active attitude, after knowing the young man who embodies the value of humane life.
Seoul 1986 Summer doesn"t have suicide scene, which is different from Seoul 1964 Winter. People can find the former parodies the latter because of several similar things between two books. First, they have the same plot in which two main characters happen to meet and talk in a snack stall, go to inn together and say goodbye to each other next day. Second, they develop the simple story without any dramatic conflict. Third, they use the images related to “wriggle” and "appearance“. Fourth, they have similar conversation, situation and title. The writer of Seoul 1986 Spring narrates the character"s ideal and emotion as an outward observer. It includes the close description, the narrative sentences, the sensible style, the unique nuance and many new vocabulary. Compared with the simple and plain structure in Seoul 1964 Winter, it has the narrative structure and various frameworks including teleportation, focus on description, overlap of the reality and the inside consciousness and change of the main character"s personality.
Today, the violence in the system incapacitates and weakens the modern people"s power under the pretext of law, ideology and government power. The public accept it to secure the established right and be satisfied with the reality, instead of fighting against it. Dongsoo Kim who got accustomed to be lethargic, recognizes the subjecthood and faces the reality with the active attitude, after knowing the young man who embodies the value of humane life.
목차
1. 서론
2. 시점 및 서사 구성
3. 소외 양상
4. 비판적 현실 인식
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
2. 시점 및 서사 구성
3. 소외 양상
4. 비판적 현실 인식
5. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
