- 영문명
- A Study on the Relationship between Political Elite and Tribalism in Iran
- 발행기관
- 한국중동학회
- 저자명
- 유달승(Yu Dal-Seung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국중동학회논총』제27권 제1호, 89~110쪽, 전체 22쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 지역학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.08.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
States in Iran were formed from complex processes. Iranian dynasties from attacking of Saljuqs until Reza Shah in the 1920s were tribal in origin except the Safavids. State rulers were themselves originally tribal leaders or their descendants.
Tribes in Iran were formed out of the intersection of dependence on resources, external powers and pressures. Tribes and states in Iran through history were interdependent and maintained each other as a single system. State rulers especially depended on tribes for military power, revenue, and regional system. They found it useful to consider a group of people to be a tribe. Tribal leaders in Iran emerged from local, regional, and governmental relationship. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries tribal combinations were Iran"s largest and effective organized political groups. State rulers in Iran often had to share power with tribes. During the constitutional revolution in 1906-1911, tribal groups were major powers in the struggle over the Qajar state. Tribal groups and leaders were variously allied with and internal tribal and confederational struggle often mirrored the wider conflicts.
Many states in Iran began as tribal dynasties societies emerged confederacies, empires, and states. Tribal groups in Iranian history have ranged from small, loosely organized, noncentralized groups to fragmented and ephemeral tribal confederacies with centralized, hierarchical leadership systems. Tribes in Iran were a constant in that they offered a continual reservoir of military force.
Tribes in Iran were formed out of the intersection of dependence on resources, external powers and pressures. Tribes and states in Iran through history were interdependent and maintained each other as a single system. State rulers especially depended on tribes for military power, revenue, and regional system. They found it useful to consider a group of people to be a tribe. Tribal leaders in Iran emerged from local, regional, and governmental relationship. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries tribal combinations were Iran"s largest and effective organized political groups. State rulers in Iran often had to share power with tribes. During the constitutional revolution in 1906-1911, tribal groups were major powers in the struggle over the Qajar state. Tribal groups and leaders were variously allied with and internal tribal and confederational struggle often mirrored the wider conflicts.
Many states in Iran began as tribal dynasties societies emerged confederacies, empires, and states. Tribal groups in Iranian history have ranged from small, loosely organized, noncentralized groups to fragmented and ephemeral tribal confederacies with centralized, hierarchical leadership systems. Tribes in Iran were a constant in that they offered a continual reservoir of military force.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이란의 부족과 부족주의의 특성
Ⅲ. 이란정치엘리트의 특성
Ⅳ. 이란근대사와 부족주의의 관계
Ⅴ. 현대이란의 정치엘리트와 부족주의
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Ⅱ. 이란의 부족과 부족주의의 특성
Ⅲ. 이란정치엘리트의 특성
Ⅳ. 이란근대사와 부족주의의 관계
Ⅴ. 현대이란의 정치엘리트와 부족주의
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!