- 영문명
- Administrative Judgment and Judicial Judgment on adolescent harmfulness
- 발행기관
- 한국형사정책학회
- 저자명
- 김혜경(Kim Hye Kyeong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사정책』刑事政策 第19卷 第1號, 305~329쪽, 전체 25쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 정책학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.06.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
Currently, the Youth Protection Act has four organs of consultation by each area to control harmful environment against young people. And, the Youth Protection Act indirectly prescribes that the organ of consultation that can judge harmful environment against young people, in particular, lewdness as well as lasciviousness has consultation right to judge primarily whether an object belongs to lewdness in accordance with the Criminal Law. In other word, each individual organ of consultation is given preliminary judgment right that can judge lewdness legally in accordance with the Criminal Law.
Precedents, however, say that the court may refer to administrative judgment of the organ of consultation and judgment on lewdness is an object of judicial judgment to rely absolutely upon the judge’s free conviction. When the organ of consultation, an admini- strative organ, inspects grades, it may judge not to be lewdness in accordance with the Criminal Law: Therefore, judiciary body may think that an article that reliable person observes grades to distribute can be applied by lewdness crime in accordance with the Criminal Law. In other words, when the one who relies upon administrative organ’s judgment may be a criminal in accordance with the court’s judgment, protection of common people who was convicted before can have problems.
In the paper, to solve the problems, illegality of the Criminal Law cannot be cognized. Finally, systematic device should be made to avoid conflict between administrative judgment and judicial judgment: When the systematic device is not permitted actually, authorized government organization should not admit of responsibility of the one who thinks of no illegality of his own act.
Precedents, however, say that the court may refer to administrative judgment of the organ of consultation and judgment on lewdness is an object of judicial judgment to rely absolutely upon the judge’s free conviction. When the organ of consultation, an admini- strative organ, inspects grades, it may judge not to be lewdness in accordance with the Criminal Law: Therefore, judiciary body may think that an article that reliable person observes grades to distribute can be applied by lewdness crime in accordance with the Criminal Law. In other words, when the one who relies upon administrative organ’s judgment may be a criminal in accordance with the court’s judgment, protection of common people who was convicted before can have problems.
In the paper, to solve the problems, illegality of the Criminal Law cannot be cognized. Finally, systematic device should be made to avoid conflict between administrative judgment and judicial judgment: When the systematic device is not permitted actually, authorized government organization should not admit of responsibility of the one who thinks of no illegality of his own act.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 청소년 유해성 심의기구
Ⅲ. 심의의 기준
Ⅳ. 심의기구 판단의 법적 효력
Ⅴ. 보론-매체별 음란성 판단의 타당성
Ⅵ. 마치며
ABSTRACT
Ⅱ. 청소년 유해성 심의기구
Ⅲ. 심의의 기준
Ⅳ. 심의기구 판단의 법적 효력
Ⅴ. 보론-매체별 음란성 판단의 타당성
Ⅵ. 마치며
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!