- 영문명
- Characteristics of Samguk Yusa(三國遺事) as an Historical Text
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 남동신(Nam Dong-Shin)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제16호, 45~70쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.04.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
There has been a premise that had been suggested during the time of Choi Nam Seon/崔南善 and has been widely accepted since then, which considered『Samguk Yusa/三國遺事』written by priest Ilyeon/一然 as the only text that was left to the Korean people to show them the original forms(原形) of the ancient Korean culture. In this article, this grand premise is critically examined.
So, this author attempted to reevaluate the value and true nature of『Samguk Yusa』from the viewpoint of the late 13th century(the time period when the text was born) and not from a viewpoint that would have been engineered in later periods. Result of such reevaluation shows two distinct characteristics of 『Samguk Yusa』 as an historical text. First, as we can see from the title, the text shows the characteristic of being the documentation of ‘Left facts(遺事)’. In 『Samguk Yusa』, things that were left out of the historical texts which had dealt with the Three-dynasties period and the Unified Shilla dynasty period were mainly collected and examined. And it seems that such collection of the "left-out" facts continued in three directions. First, things that were not dealt with or included in『Samguk Sagi/三國史記』written by Kim Bu Shik/金富軾, who was a Confucian scholar(儒者) and therefore designed the text as a King-based, royal affairs-based one and also concentrated upon the history of political affairs, were collected. Second, things that were not dealt with or included in『Haedong Goseung-jeon/海東高僧傳』 written by Gakhun/覺訓, who was a Gyojong/敎宗-school Buddhist priest and designed the text around Buddhist priests" biologies, were collected. And third, things that were not included in his(一然) own texts about the history of Seon school(禪宗史) must have been collected as well. As we can see, historical texts that dealt with the ancient history and culture of Korea existed in at least three of these areas at this point, so it can be said that the publication of 『Samguk Yusa』was intended to supplement these existing texts.
Because『Samguk Yusa』was a collection of ‘left facts[遺事]’, it covered the historical facts of the Korean history that were not included in previous historical texts, and as a result came to reflect the society of the Goryeo dynasty up until the latter half period of the 13th century. As we can see from the title originally it must have been meant to deal with the left out things in the history of the Three dynasties, yet the facts that are discussed in this text are from the 4th century through the ending days of the 13th century. This means that between the date of publication of 『Samguk Yus a』 and the days of the Three dynasties and the Unified Shilla, there was a time gap bigger than 250 years and smaller than 900. This kind of time gap would surely have had influence upon the people"s viewing of the "original forms of the ancient culture". So, it is clear that texts which were written during the Goryeo dynasty period cannot be considered as texts containing the "original forms of the ancient culture", and they should be interpreted instead as reflections of the Goryeo people"s view upon the ancient culture. This is what this author wish to label as the second characteristic of『Samguk Yusa』.
So, this author attempted to reevaluate the value and true nature of『Samguk Yusa』from the viewpoint of the late 13th century(the time period when the text was born) and not from a viewpoint that would have been engineered in later periods. Result of such reevaluation shows two distinct characteristics of 『Samguk Yusa』 as an historical text. First, as we can see from the title, the text shows the characteristic of being the documentation of ‘Left facts(遺事)’. In 『Samguk Yusa』, things that were left out of the historical texts which had dealt with the Three-dynasties period and the Unified Shilla dynasty period were mainly collected and examined. And it seems that such collection of the "left-out" facts continued in three directions. First, things that were not dealt with or included in『Samguk Sagi/三國史記』written by Kim Bu Shik/金富軾, who was a Confucian scholar(儒者) and therefore designed the text as a King-based, royal affairs-based one and also concentrated upon the history of political affairs, were collected. Second, things that were not dealt with or included in『Haedong Goseung-jeon/海東高僧傳』 written by Gakhun/覺訓, who was a Gyojong/敎宗-school Buddhist priest and designed the text around Buddhist priests" biologies, were collected. And third, things that were not included in his(一然) own texts about the history of Seon school(禪宗史) must have been collected as well. As we can see, historical texts that dealt with the ancient history and culture of Korea existed in at least three of these areas at this point, so it can be said that the publication of 『Samguk Yusa』was intended to supplement these existing texts.
Because『Samguk Yusa』was a collection of ‘left facts[遺事]’, it covered the historical facts of the Korean history that were not included in previous historical texts, and as a result came to reflect the society of the Goryeo dynasty up until the latter half period of the 13th century. As we can see from the title originally it must have been meant to deal with the left out things in the history of the Three dynasties, yet the facts that are discussed in this text are from the 4th century through the ending days of the 13th century. This means that between the date of publication of 『Samguk Yus a』 and the days of the Three dynasties and the Unified Shilla, there was a time gap bigger than 250 years and smaller than 900. This kind of time gap would surely have had influence upon the people"s viewing of the "original forms of the ancient culture". So, it is clear that texts which were written during the Goryeo dynasty period cannot be considered as texts containing the "original forms of the ancient culture", and they should be interpreted instead as reflections of the Goryeo people"s view upon the ancient culture. This is what this author wish to label as the second characteristic of『Samguk Yusa』.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 一然과 『三國遺事』의 관계
Ⅲ. 遺事의 특성
Ⅳ. 反影의 특성
Ⅴ. 맺음말
영문초록
Ⅱ. 一然과 『三國遺事』의 관계
Ⅲ. 遺事의 특성
Ⅳ. 反影의 특성
Ⅴ. 맺음말
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!