『壇經』의 ‘三無’와 老莊의 ‘三無’思想의 비교

• 영문명: The Comparison of "Three Non-being" between Dan-jing and Lao-zhuang
• 발행기관: 불교학연구회
• 저자명: 김진무(Kim Jin-moo)
• 간행물 정보: 『불교학연구』제12호, 353~379쪽, 전체 27쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 불교학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.12.01

영문 초록

  The essay is focused upon comparatively studying "Three Non-being" in Dan-jing and Lao-zhuang. The former"s is called "Wu-nian", "Wu-xiang", "Wu-zhu", and the latter"s "Wu-wu", "Wu-qing", "Wu-dai". In fact, in its unfolding process, Chinese Buddhism has been closely connected and developed with the traditional thoughts of China, especially with Confucianism and Taoism. Particularly, among the Buddhistic schools, the school of Praj？a is much more related with the thought of Lao-zhuang. Given the premise that Dan-jing is radically appeared as a Buddhistic theory based upon the school of Praj？a, we can more clearly understand that Dan-jing has some profound relationship with the thought of Lao-zhuang. Therefore, as I argue in the essay, it is so natural that Dan-jing"s "Three Non-being" and Lao-zhuang"s should have some similarities. Between them there is a kind of identical property that "Wu-nian" is equivalent to "Wu-qing", "Wu-xiang" to "Wu-wu", and "Wu-zhu" to "Wu-dai". In the former, "Wu-nian" is said to attain at the ideal state of emancipation through the "Praj？a-samadhi". In the latter, it is said that, through "Wu-qing", man can restore his own nature of original substance, where the Way of "the absence of non-existence" is universally existent, and, thus, he can "leisurely stroll in the field". "Wu-xiang" is referred to as a reality for all kinds of laws, whereas "Wu-wu" as the originally substantial attribute of the Way. "Wu-zhu" ultimately is "Non-bondage", while "Wu-dai" results in the ultimate stage of "leisurely strolling in the field", in which does not have any bondage of dependence and conditions in this world. As a result, it seems to me, Dan-jing"s "Three Non-being" and Lao-zhuang"s all have a double character, that is, both the methods of self-cultivation and the ideal state of emancipation. It can be regarded as one of similarities between them, too.
  Dan-jing"s Chan and Lao-zhuang"s thought, however, are respectively their different systems. Chan Buddhism, of course, has been inherently connected with the traditional thought of China, but, nevertheless, it also originates from the Buddhistic thinking-way of India. Thus, in Chinese Buddhism, from the beginning of the Applied Buddhism, some Buddhists have made a series of criticisms on Lao-zhuang"s thought, supporting the Indian thinking-way.

목차

Ⅰ. 緖言
Ⅱ. 老莊의 ‘三無’思想과 中國佛敎의 受用
Ⅲ.『壇經』의 ‘三無’사상
Ⅳ.『壇經』과 老莊 ‘三無’의 同異
Ⅴ. 結語
영문초록

키워드

단경(壇經) Dan-jing 노장(老莊) Lao-zhuang 격의불교(格義佛敎) Applied Buddhism 삼무(三無) Three Non-being 무념(無念) Wu-nian 무상(無相) Wu-xiang 무주(無住) Wu-zhu 무물(無物) Wu-wu 무정(無情) Wu-qing 무대(無待) Wu-dai