『중론』「觀四諦品」의 공성 - 『유가사지론』「眞實義品」에 의탁해서 새로 보기

• 발행기관: 불교학연구회
• 저자명: 박인성(Park In Seong)
• 간행물 정보: 『불교학연구』제2호, 193~225쪽, 전체 33쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 불교학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2001.06.01

영문 초록

  By negating the self-nature(=svabh？va), N？g？rjuna manifested de pendent arising(=prat？tyasamutp？da) in each chapter of his Madh ya maka？？stra. As the primary characteristic of emptiness(=？？nya t？) is to negate this self-nature, if we grasp this meaning of emptiness, we can understand the meaning of dependent arising N？garjuna intended to transmit. this emptiness, however, is likely to be accepted as negativity only. So when we grasp together complementaries such as dependent arising and provisional name(=praj？apti), param？rthasa tya(=truth in terms of ultimate fruit) and samvrtisatya(=truth relating to worldly covention), we can understand that emptinss also contains positivity N？g？rjuna treated the emptiness of positivity in " the exam inatin of the noble truths(=arya-satya-pariks？)," and he conden sed the contents of this chapter in its eighteenth verse. The eigteenth verse is as follows.
  We declare that whatever is dependent arising, that is emptiness.
  That is a provisional name relying upon (dependent arising). That is the middle path.
  (ya？ pratityasamutp？da？ ？nyat？？ t？？ pracak？amahe / s？ praj？a ptir up？d？ya pratipat saiva madhyam？ / /)
  Therefore, if we analyse this verse we come to know more deeply what he means by emptiness and dependent arising.
  If we investigate how the Madhyamika school"s philosophers succeeding N？g？rjuna interpreted the meaning of his emptiness, we can ascertain that they could not enlarge more widely the meaning of emptiness he wished to transmit. These Madyamika school"s philoso phers also accepted his emptiness as a positivity, but they emphasized negativity much more. ultimately they could not develop the various aspects of emptiness.
  However, the yogac？ra school"s philosophers in India and China understood this positivity of emptiness more deeply. It is because they grasped the characteristics of language correctly and acknowledged the function of it that they understood this positivity more deeply.

목차

1. 들어가기
2. 『중론』「관사제품」의 공성
3. 중관논사들의 해석
4. 『유가사지론』「진실의품」의 공성
5. 유식논사들의 해석
6. 맺기