- 영문명
- The Analysis of the Concepts of Prajñā and Śūnya in Zhao-lun
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 허인섭(Heo In-Sub)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제11호, 257~293쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.08.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper aims at disclosing the influence of Neo-Taoist idea on Zhao-lun. In oredr to get the philosophical characteristics of Zhao-lun, this paper introduces the differences between the classical Taoism and Neo-Taoism. The most important difference between them is that Neo-Taoism shows a simple reductionism and a Chinese mode of metaphysical thinking, which are similar to western ones. This differences is important to analyze some delicate statements having two fold aspects formed to be influenced by both classical and Neo-Taoist idea.
In analyzing the above treatise, it must be firstly notified that the Chinese people in Wei-Chin period could not acknowledge clearly the similar and the different aspects of Buddhism and Taoism. It resulted in a serious misunderstanding among Chinese Buddhists regarding the original Indian Buddhist concepts, praj？？ or ？？nya, etc. Zhao-lun was also written in this period and could not be an exceptional one to overcome completely the limitation of the spirit of the times. Secondly, it needs to clarify the original meaning of ？？nya and how Chinese Buddhist scholars transformed its meaning according to the Taoist or Neo-Taoist way of thinking. In this period, the concept of ？？nya was understood as an fundamental nothingness which frequently mentioned in Wang-pi"s work. This way of understanding has maintained in the history of Chinese Buddhism.
However, this paper suggests that the concept of ？？nya should be understood in the context of the history of Indian philosophy. In spite of that the concept of ？？nya cannot be an ontological one, it has been interpreted ontologically or metaphysically not only by Chinese Buddhist monks but also by modern western philosophers. This paper points out that ？？nya is a synonym of an？tma and should be understood in the light of the theory of "dependent arising"(緣起). By comparing the original meaning of ？？nya and praj？？ as the above with those seen in Zhao-lun, it discloses that Seng-zhao understood those concepts ontologically under the influence of Neo-Taoism.
In analyzing the above treatise, it must be firstly notified that the Chinese people in Wei-Chin period could not acknowledge clearly the similar and the different aspects of Buddhism and Taoism. It resulted in a serious misunderstanding among Chinese Buddhists regarding the original Indian Buddhist concepts, praj？？ or ？？nya, etc. Zhao-lun was also written in this period and could not be an exceptional one to overcome completely the limitation of the spirit of the times. Secondly, it needs to clarify the original meaning of ？？nya and how Chinese Buddhist scholars transformed its meaning according to the Taoist or Neo-Taoist way of thinking. In this period, the concept of ？？nya was understood as an fundamental nothingness which frequently mentioned in Wang-pi"s work. This way of understanding has maintained in the history of Chinese Buddhism.
However, this paper suggests that the concept of ？？nya should be understood in the context of the history of Indian philosophy. In spite of that the concept of ？？nya cannot be an ontological one, it has been interpreted ontologically or metaphysically not only by Chinese Buddhist monks but also by modern western philosophers. This paper points out that ？？nya is a synonym of an？tma and should be understood in the light of the theory of "dependent arising"(緣起). By comparing the original meaning of ？？nya and praj？？ as the above with those seen in Zhao-lun, it discloses that Seng-zhao understood those concepts ontologically under the influence of Neo-Taoism.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 승조 시대의 사상적 배경
Ⅲ. 조론의 중국불교적 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
영문초록
Ⅱ. 승조 시대의 사상적 배경
Ⅲ. 조론의 중국불교적 특성
Ⅳ. 결론
영문초록
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!