- 영문명
- Development of a NOC Applied Nursing Outcomes Evaluation Tool for Abdominal Surgery Patients
- 발행기관
- 계명대학교 간호과학연구소
- 저자명
- 이선희(Sun Hee Lee) 이병숙(Byoung Sook Lee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『간호와 보건과학』제10권 제1호, 121~134쪽, 전체 14쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 간호학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.02.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a nursing outcome evaluation tool for abdominal surgery patients.
Method: Target population of this tool is adult patients with abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Among the NOC nursing outcomes and indicators, 22 nursing outcomes and 103 core indicators were selected by nurse experts for the population. Using these, five point likert scale was developed as a nursing outcomes evaluation tool for abdominal surgery patients. Inter-rater reliability and predictive validity were tested by applying this tool to 20 patients. Two raters were participated for testing inter-rater reliability. For testing predictive validity, patients satisfaction on the nursing care obtained with VAS was used. Evaluations were performed on post-op 4th day and 1 day before discharge.
Result: The correlation coefficients between the scores from the raters were r=0.85(p=0.000) in post-op 4th day and r=0.85(p=0.000) in the day before discharge. There were no significant difference between the scores. There were significant correlations between patient satisfaction and the nursing outcome scores in post-op 4th day(r=0.47, p=0.011), and the day before discharge(r=0.47, p=0.015).
Conclusion: The reliability and the validity of this nursing outcomes evaluation tool for abdominal surgery patients were validated.
Method: Target population of this tool is adult patients with abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Among the NOC nursing outcomes and indicators, 22 nursing outcomes and 103 core indicators were selected by nurse experts for the population. Using these, five point likert scale was developed as a nursing outcomes evaluation tool for abdominal surgery patients. Inter-rater reliability and predictive validity were tested by applying this tool to 20 patients. Two raters were participated for testing inter-rater reliability. For testing predictive validity, patients satisfaction on the nursing care obtained with VAS was used. Evaluations were performed on post-op 4th day and 1 day before discharge.
Result: The correlation coefficients between the scores from the raters were r=0.85(p=0.000) in post-op 4th day and r=0.85(p=0.000) in the day before discharge. There were no significant difference between the scores. There were significant correlations between patient satisfaction and the nursing outcome scores in post-op 4th day(r=0.47, p=0.011), and the day before discharge(r=0.47, p=0.015).
Conclusion: The reliability and the validity of this nursing outcomes evaluation tool for abdominal surgery patients were validated.
목차
논의
연구방법
연구결과
논의
결론 및 제언
참고문헌
영어 초록
Address reprint requests to
연구방법
연구결과
논의
결론 및 제언
참고문헌
영어 초록
Address reprint requests to
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!