- 영문명
- Limitations on Usefulness of “Statutory Real Right granted by Way of Security” - In connection with the decision of Korean Supreme Court 2005. 10. 13. announcement 2004da26799 -
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 韓雄吉(Han Woong-kil)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第23卷 第2號, 195~220쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.10.01

국문 초록
영문 초록
A Real right granted by way of security is the priority in comparision with other bond, there are two types of rights. One is a statutory real right granted by way of security and the other is security right by contract. Statutory real right granted by way of security is different from security right by contract in establishment. As Statutory real right granted by way of security, 3 kinds of rights those are the right of retention, statutory pledge, statutory mortgage, are admitted in the existing Korean Civil Code. But judicial precedents and a theory have admitted all kinds of privileged debts (for example, privilege of wage claim, lien on a ship) as statutory real right granted by way of security.
The latest judicial precedent(the decision of Korean Supreme Court 2005. 10. 13. announcement 2004da26799) also declared that privilege of wage claim, has priority than lien on a ship. Because both privileged debts(privilege of wage claim, lien on a ship) are statutory real right granted by way of security and we have to rank all of statutory real right granted by way of security.
However, if we followed logic of this precedent, wages of a sailor are more later than wages of other worker in protection. and it is not proper that all kinds of privileged debts think one thing(statutory real right granted by way of security). if we think various kinds of privileged debts as one thing, the meaning of statutory real right granted by way of security will be only classification concept. It is hard to give to any more meaning.
The latest judicial precedent(the decision of Korean Supreme Court 2005. 10. 13. announcement 2004da26799) also declared that privilege of wage claim, has priority than lien on a ship. Because both privileged debts(privilege of wage claim, lien on a ship) are statutory real right granted by way of security and we have to rank all of statutory real right granted by way of security.
However, if we followed logic of this precedent, wages of a sailor are more later than wages of other worker in protection. and it is not proper that all kinds of privileged debts think one thing(statutory real right granted by way of security). if we think various kinds of privileged debts as one thing, the meaning of statutory real right granted by way of security will be only classification concept. It is hard to give to any more meaning.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기 (대법원 2005. 10. 13. 선고 2004다26799 판결의 검토)
Ⅱ. 법정담보물권의 종류와 내용
Ⅲ. 법정담보물권의 특색
Ⅳ. 이 판례의 타당성 검토
Ⅴ. 결론 (법정담보물권 개념의 유용성의 한계)
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 법정담보물권의 종류와 내용
Ⅲ. 법정담보물권의 특색
Ⅳ. 이 판례의 타당성 검토
Ⅴ. 결론 (법정담보물권 개념의 유용성의 한계)
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
