- 영문명
- Modality meaning of Auxiliary Verb ‘-ə bərida’
- 발행기관
- 어문연구학회
- 저자명
- 권순구(Soon-ku Kwon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『어문연구』語文硏究 第51輯, 233~252쪽, 전체 20쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 한국어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.08.30
국문 초록
영문 초록
Though the auxiliary verb has character of grammatical category, also has lexical meaning. So auxiliary verb has some relation with main verb.
Auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’ has a few relation with main verb. Because the prototype meaning of main verb ‘-? b?rida’ is “intentionally exclusion about one"s possession.” Yet, when we seek after the relation on the ground of auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’, if our view restrict only "perpect" that it"s a "aspect meaning", it is very difficult to find the relation with main verb.
The auxiliary verb reveals aspect meaning and modality meaning. Even though many view that ‘-? b?rida’(-어 버리다) has the aspect meaning, perfect, in fact, it has modality meaning presenting positive or negative attitude to changes in context. According to these reason I denied the aspect meaning, perfect, in auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’. At first, imperpect preceeding ending "-ry?-" can be used inside of ‘-? b?rida’. And then ‘-? b?rida’ also can be used "-myeons?’. Moreover, when "-myeon" that it conduct "if-clause" combined with ‘-? b?rida’, that meaning present "perpect" or "imperpect" in according to context. It means that ‘-? b?rida’ has no meaning of aspect.
‘-? b?rida’ has modality meaning that means “exclusion of burden” or “ regret”. “exclusion” is same included auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’ and main verb ‘-? b?rida’. So it is very difficult to concern with aspect meaning, perfect, but if we try to concern with modality meaning, “exclusion of burden”, we can find the relation between auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’ and main verb ‘-? b?rida’.
Auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’ has a few relation with main verb. Because the prototype meaning of main verb ‘-? b?rida’ is “intentionally exclusion about one"s possession.” Yet, when we seek after the relation on the ground of auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’, if our view restrict only "perpect" that it"s a "aspect meaning", it is very difficult to find the relation with main verb.
The auxiliary verb reveals aspect meaning and modality meaning. Even though many view that ‘-? b?rida’(-어 버리다) has the aspect meaning, perfect, in fact, it has modality meaning presenting positive or negative attitude to changes in context. According to these reason I denied the aspect meaning, perfect, in auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’. At first, imperpect preceeding ending "-ry?-" can be used inside of ‘-? b?rida’. And then ‘-? b?rida’ also can be used "-myeons?’. Moreover, when "-myeon" that it conduct "if-clause" combined with ‘-? b?rida’, that meaning present "perpect" or "imperpect" in according to context. It means that ‘-? b?rida’ has no meaning of aspect.
‘-? b?rida’ has modality meaning that means “exclusion of burden” or “ regret”. “exclusion” is same included auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’ and main verb ‘-? b?rida’. So it is very difficult to concern with aspect meaning, perfect, but if we try to concern with modality meaning, “exclusion of burden”, we can find the relation between auxiliary verb ‘-? b?rida’ and main verb ‘-? b?rida’.
목차
1. 서론
2. 본용언 ‘버리다’의 의미
3. 보조용언의 문법적 의미
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
2. 본용언 ‘버리다’의 의미
3. 보조용언의 문법적 의미
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!