- 영문명
- The Research on the Importance of Service in the Tennis Game
- 발행기관
- 경희대학교 스포츠과학연구원
- 저자명
- 박영균(Park Young-Kyun) 김동선(Kim Dong-Sun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『체육학논문집』제25집, 115~139쪽, 전체 25쪽
- 주제분류
- 예술체육 > 체육
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 1997.12.01

국문 초록
영문 초록
This study is aimed for making clear what kind of superior elements could effect on content of games. Analyzising the content of games through data gained by the method of video tape, with sample of 10 male and 10 female athletes of excellent group compared to same number of general group in the games of 1996 French Open and 1997 Australian Open, we are able to provide athletes and their conductors with helpful data. This we had reached conclusions as follow:
1. In comparison of group case, the first service success rate is at male excellent group 58.03% and general group 58.03% and general group 61.89%, at female excellent group 64.43% and general group 66.35%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
2. In comparison of Group case the second service success rate is at male excellent group 89.99% and general group 90.55% at female excellent group 90.55% and general 90.55% and general group 88.17%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
3. In comparison of Group case The acquired point rate after success first service is at male excellent group 77.53% and general group 68.75% Non significant difference appeared in term at female excellent group 67.30% and general group 57.69%. Significant difference appeared in term(P<.05).
4. In comparison of Group case The acquired point rate after success second service is at male excellent group 60.55% and general group 57.39% at female excellent group 51.62% and general group 52.86%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
5. In comparison of Group case Double fault rate is at male excellent group 10.01% and general group 9.45% at female excellent group 9.45% and general group with rate of 11.83%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
6. In comparison of Group case Service Ace success rate is at male excellent group 7.94% and general group 3.89% at female excellent group 1.74% and general ground 1.40%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
7. In comparison of Group case Break point success rate is at male excellent group 47.31% and general group 37.55% at female excellent group 55.36% and general group 51.45%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
8. In comparison of Group case Unforce Errors result is at male excellent group 20.69% and general group 25.30%. Non significant difference appeared in term at female excellent group 24.65% and general group 32.60%. Singnificant difference in term(p<.05).
1. In comparison of group case, the first service success rate is at male excellent group 58.03% and general group 58.03% and general group 61.89%, at female excellent group 64.43% and general group 66.35%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
2. In comparison of Group case the second service success rate is at male excellent group 89.99% and general group 90.55% at female excellent group 90.55% and general 90.55% and general group 88.17%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
3. In comparison of Group case The acquired point rate after success first service is at male excellent group 77.53% and general group 68.75% Non significant difference appeared in term at female excellent group 67.30% and general group 57.69%. Significant difference appeared in term(P<.05).
4. In comparison of Group case The acquired point rate after success second service is at male excellent group 60.55% and general group 57.39% at female excellent group 51.62% and general group 52.86%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
5. In comparison of Group case Double fault rate is at male excellent group 10.01% and general group 9.45% at female excellent group 9.45% and general group with rate of 11.83%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
6. In comparison of Group case Service Ace success rate is at male excellent group 7.94% and general group 3.89% at female excellent group 1.74% and general ground 1.40%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
7. In comparison of Group case Break point success rate is at male excellent group 47.31% and general group 37.55% at female excellent group 55.36% and general group 51.45%. Non significant difference appeared in term.
8. In comparison of Group case Unforce Errors result is at male excellent group 20.69% and general group 25.30%. Non significant difference appeared in term at female excellent group 24.65% and general group 32.60%. Singnificant difference in term(p<.05).
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 理論的 背景
Ⅲ. 硏究方法
Ⅳ. 硏究 結果 및 考察
Ⅴ. 結論
參考文獻
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 理論的 背景
Ⅲ. 硏究方法
Ⅳ. 硏究 結果 및 考察
Ⅴ. 結論
參考文獻
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
