- 영문명
- Defamatory intention and public concern in the crime of "libel in cyber space" in Korea
- 발행기관
- 한국형사정책학회
- 저자명
- 윤종행(Yoon Jong-Haeng)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사정책』형사정책 제18권 제1호, 289~324쪽, 전체 36쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.06.01
국문 초록
영문 초록
Due to its capability for instantaneous global communication, the Internet has provided a new frontier for free expression. The Internet offers anyone who wants to express an opinion about anything can make their thoughts available to a world-wide audience far more easily than has ever been possible before.
However, invasions of personal privacy and honour through internet are an extremely frequent occurrence. The right to freedom of expression sometimes conflicts with the right to privacy. It is therefore necessary to find a way of balancing the exercise of two fundamental rights and to draw up of guidelines.
Since proof of the writer"s defamatory intentions is hard to provide, the fact that the information is not a matter of "public concern" is generally accepted as proof of defamation in Korean Supreme Court. It would be hopeful for Korean Supreme Court to pursue flexible balancing in adjudicatingparticular cases and the categorization for legal certainty simultaneously. An effort must also be made to clarify the interface, where the right to privacy begins and the freedom of expression and information ends and vice versa, so that these two liberties border on each other seamlessly.
However, invasions of personal privacy and honour through internet are an extremely frequent occurrence. The right to freedom of expression sometimes conflicts with the right to privacy. It is therefore necessary to find a way of balancing the exercise of two fundamental rights and to draw up of guidelines.
Since proof of the writer"s defamatory intentions is hard to provide, the fact that the information is not a matter of "public concern" is generally accepted as proof of defamation in Korean Supreme Court. It would be hopeful for Korean Supreme Court to pursue flexible balancing in adjudicatingparticular cases and the categorization for legal certainty simultaneously. An effort must also be made to clarify the interface, where the right to privacy begins and the freedom of expression and information ends and vice versa, so that these two liberties border on each other seamlessly.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 명예훼손에 관한 외국의 입법 및 판례의 동향
Ⅲ. 정보통신망(인터넷)을 이용한 명예훼손행위에 대한 형법적 평가
Ⅳ. 사이버명예훼손행위의 비방목적과 공익관련성의 관계
Ⅴ. 결론
ABSTRACT
Ⅱ. 명예훼손에 관한 외국의 입법 및 판례의 동향
Ⅲ. 정보통신망(인터넷)을 이용한 명예훼손행위에 대한 형법적 평가
Ⅳ. 사이버명예훼손행위의 비방목적과 공익관련성의 관계
Ⅴ. 결론
ABSTRACT
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!