후기고전학파와 신고전학파의 방법론-연속성 여부를 중심으로-

• 영문명: The Later Classicists and Neo-Classicists on the Methodology of Economics-focused on continuities and/or discontinuities between them-
• 발행기관: 인하대학교 산업경제연구소
• 저자명: 박장환(Jang-Hwan Park)
• 간행물 정보: 『경상논집』경상논집 제18집 제2호, 21~40쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2004.12.01

영문 초록

This paper compares the methodological views of the later Classicists(e.g, J.S. Mill, Senior, Cairnes) with those of the Neo-classicists(e.g, Marshall, Pigou) and indicates continuities and/or discontinuities in point of view and procedures between these two groups. The later Classicists regarded Political Economy as essentially an abstract science and its method as the method a priori. Political Economy reasons from assumed premises and draws conclusions through deduction. The conclusions are only true in the abstract; they are only true under certain suppositions, in which none but general causes are taken into the account. The Neo-classicists emphasized on collecting, arranging, interpreting, and drawmg inferences from facts. Deduction must rest on the basis of inductions; inductive process involves and includes analysis and deduction. However, Marshall's methodological position is hardly said to be a new paradigm to the deductive paradigm. Marshall's methodology reflects his synthesis of the later Classicists and the Marginalist schools. While, works of both the later Classicists and the Neo-classicists reveal discrepancy between their method and practice.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 경제학의 범위와 정의

Ⅲ. 논리적 추론 과정

Ⅳ. 방법론의 연속성과 단절성

Ⅴ. 약간의 보론

Ⅵ. 결론

<參考文獻>

Abstract