이효석의 「산협」에 나타난 초점화 연구

• 영문명: Focalizational review on 'Sanhyeop' of Hyoseok Lee
• 발행기관: 한국언어문학회
• 저자명: 신희교(Shin Hee-Kyo)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국언어문학』한국언어문학 제51집, 517~538쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 한국어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2003.12.01

영문 초록

It must be a hypothesis to explain a novel on the side of focalization which is originally impossible in description. But a theory of focalization is a another trial to explain a novel as it is. There were few novels published at the end of the reign of Japan in Korea. It was already known that this period was the age of darkness of modem literature of Korea. Therefore, it must be a very important attempt to apply a theory of focalization to investigate the history of forgotten period of literature of Korea through 'Sanhyeop'. 'Sanhyeop' was published ar the point of view of omniscience. The point of view of omniscience includes the multilateral theory of external focalization, do not means the focalization zero. At the view of focalization, 'Sanhyeop' represents a panchronical focalization that was not personalized with external focalization and unlimited knowledgement at the epistemological point. Furthermore we can also find the perception with internal and external side of View. 'Sanhyeop' was a paradoxical false narration which hid the truth. This work tells us that 'without false, no truth!'. But there was a little confusion in the work with the fault of naming on focalization. We can also find several grammatical errors in the sentence with the incompletion of focalization, those result in the failure of the dramatical effect of this novel with the narrated defamiliarization. 'Sanhyeop' was one of the very important work at this period with 메밀꽃 필 무렵→개살구→산협, which were the memorial three works of west region of Kangwon province those were related with the tale of salt salesman. But there were some defaults found in this work. Those defaultS found were resulted with the undulation of the focalizer. The other reviews are required at the point of 초록의 탑(국민신보, 1940.1.7~4.28) and 아자미의 장(국민문학, 1941.11) ete. those were written in Japanese in the future.

목차

1. 서론

2. 본론

3. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract