한국경제의 성장요인과 산업정책의 역할-동아시아 성장모델과 관련하여-

• 영문명: The Sources of Economic Growth and the Role of Industrial Policy in Korea
• 발행기관: 한국경제연구원
• 저자명: 이병기(Lee Byoungki)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국경제연구원 연구보고서』연구보고서 (1999), 9~91쪽, 전체 91쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1999.01.01

영문 초록

The purpose of this paper is to analyse the sources of the economic growth and the role the industrial policy in Korea. By the application of the translog production model for the period of 1967-1996, total factor productivity(TFP) IS estimated by 28 sectors Manufacturing industries grow annually by 15.68% during this period, of which 1.59% is due to the growth of TFP and the rest due to the growth of input factors. Korean manufacturing growth shows an input-factor driven pattern, achieved mainly by the quantitative growth of factors of production, especially capital input, rather than by productivity Improvement. The TFP decreased during the period of Heavy and Chemical Industriailzation(HCI) when the government's industrial intervention was very active. Korea made large investments in manufacturing sector during the HCI period, while It neglected the introduction of advanced technologies and management systems The financial sector plays an important role in terms of fund allocation. Support for centralized investment of capital between 1970 and 1980 was enabled by a loose financial structure. That is, a loose financial control contributed to capital accumulation but did not lead to the improvement of TFP. And using the constructed panel data on the Korean manufacturing sector, the impacts of government industtial policies are tested on the growth of TFP dunng 1967-1990. The empirical results show that excessive protection measures, measured by effective protection rate, had strong negative effects on TFP in Korean manufacturing. And government industnal policies, such as policy loan and tax incentives, were little correlated with growth rate of TFP. As World Bank(l993) expressed, Korean economic success occurred in spite of rather than because of government interventions. In conclusion, opening up to international markets is equally important both from the perspective of exerting competitive pressures as well as gammg from the diffusion of technical knowledge. And the weak financial system has led directly to weak corporate governance and lack of corporate governance, in turn, reduces managers' incentives to focus on productivity. It is advisable to make efforts to maximize the efficiency in business and banking sectors, such as introducing advanced managed techniques and Improving the business governance system.

목차

제1장 서론

제2장 동아시아 국가의 경제성장과 정부역할

제3장 한국의 산업정책과 자원배분의 효율성

제4장 요약 및 결론

참고문헌

ABSTRACT