- 영문명
- Changes in Distributive Equity of Health Insurance Contribution Burden
- 발행기관
- 개인저작물
- 저자명
- 강희정(HeeChung Kang) 박은철(Eun-Cheol Park) 이규식(KyuSik Lee) 박태규(TaeKyu Park) 정우진(WooJin Chung) 김한중(HanJoong Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『개인저작물 - 사회』예방의학회지 제38권 제1호, 107~116쪽, 전체 10쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 개인저작물
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.01.01
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
Objectives : We analyzed the changes from 1996 to 2002 in distributive equity of the contribution burden in the Korean National Health Insurance.
Methods : The study subjects were a total of 8,923 employee households and a total of 7,296 self-employed households over the period from 1996 to 2002. Those were the households meeting the two criteria as completing each annual survey and having no change in the job of head of the household during that period from the raw data of the Household Income and Expenditure Survey annually conducted by the Korean National Statistical Office. The unit of analysis was a household, and this was the standard for assessing the contribution that is now applied on a monthly basis.
Deciles Distribution Ratio, Contribution Concentration Curve and Contribution Concentration Index were estimated as the index of inequality. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to compare the annual ability-topay elasticity of the contribution to the reference year of 1996 for three groups (all households, the employee households, and the self-employed households).
Results : For the index of inequality, the distributive equity of contribution was improved in all three groups. In particular, the employee group experienced a substantial improvement. Using multiple regression analysis, the ability-to-pay elasticity of the contribution in the employee group significantly increased (??=0.232, p<0.0001) in the year 2002 as compared to the reference year of 1996. The elasticity in the self-employed group also significantly increased (??=0.186, p<0.05), although its change was smaller than that in the employee group.
Conclusions : The employee group had a greater improvement for the distributive equity of the contribution burden than the self-employed group. Within the observation period, there were two important integration reforms: one was the integration of 227 self-employed societies in 1998 and the other was the integration of 139 employee societies in 2000. We expected that the equity of the contribution burden would be improved for the selfemployed group since the integration reform of 1998. However, it was not improved for the self-employed group until the year 2000. This result suggests that capturing exactly the beneficiaries` ability-to-pay such as income is the precedent for distributive equity of the contribution burden, although a more sophisticated imposition standard of contribution is needed.
Methods : The study subjects were a total of 8,923 employee households and a total of 7,296 self-employed households over the period from 1996 to 2002. Those were the households meeting the two criteria as completing each annual survey and having no change in the job of head of the household during that period from the raw data of the Household Income and Expenditure Survey annually conducted by the Korean National Statistical Office. The unit of analysis was a household, and this was the standard for assessing the contribution that is now applied on a monthly basis.
Deciles Distribution Ratio, Contribution Concentration Curve and Contribution Concentration Index were estimated as the index of inequality. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to compare the annual ability-topay elasticity of the contribution to the reference year of 1996 for three groups (all households, the employee households, and the self-employed households).
Results : For the index of inequality, the distributive equity of contribution was improved in all three groups. In particular, the employee group experienced a substantial improvement. Using multiple regression analysis, the ability-to-pay elasticity of the contribution in the employee group significantly increased (??=0.232, p<0.0001) in the year 2002 as compared to the reference year of 1996. The elasticity in the self-employed group also significantly increased (??=0.186, p<0.05), although its change was smaller than that in the employee group.
Conclusions : The employee group had a greater improvement for the distributive equity of the contribution burden than the self-employed group. Within the observation period, there were two important integration reforms: one was the integration of 227 self-employed societies in 1998 and the other was the integration of 139 employee societies in 2000. We expected that the equity of the contribution burden would be improved for the selfemployed group since the integration reform of 1998. However, it was not improved for the self-employed group until the year 2000. This result suggests that capturing exactly the beneficiaries` ability-to-pay such as income is the precedent for distributive equity of the contribution burden, although a more sophisticated imposition standard of contribution is needed.
목차
서론
연구방법
연구결과
고찰
요약 및 결론
참고문헌
연구방법
연구결과
고찰
요약 및 결론
참고문헌
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 개인저작물분야 NEW
- 우크라이나 전쟁과 군사적 약소국의 최후무기 개발
- 우크라이나 전쟁과 군사적 약소국의 전쟁방지 및 10년이상 장기 독재자 퇴출
- 우크라이나 전쟁과 군사강국 독재자 타도무기 액체염소탄 시스템의 개념설계
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
