학술논문
High vs. low negation in English NPQs: How Korean EFL and ESL learners diverge
이용수 3
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 경희대학교 언어정보연구소
- 저자명
- Keunhyung Park
- 간행물 정보
- 『언어연구』제42권 Special Edition, 291~316쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 언어학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2025.09.30
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
This studyinvestigates how Korean learners of English interpret positive polar questions (PPQs)and the two structurally distinct negative polar questions (NPQs). Thirty classroom‑basedEFL learners in Korea and sixty immersion‑based ESL learners in the United Statescompleted a series of three online experiment. Each task paired an unambiguous visualprompt with either a PPQ, a high‑negation NPQ (Didn’t you see…?), or a low‑negationNPQ (Did you really not see…?). Response times and answering patterns reveal a cleardissociation. Immersive exposure yields near‑native performance on the high‑negationNPQs, yet both learner groups—most strikingly the higher‑proficiency ESL cohort—show severe difficulty with low‑negation NPQs, producing up to 74 % unexpectedanswers and significantly slower responses. These results challenge the traditional“polarity‑ vs. truth‑based” dichotomy, demonstrating that acquisition hinges on inputfrequency and explicit form-meaning mapping rather than overall proficiency. Pedagogically, targeted instruction on inner‑VP negation is recommended.
영문 초록
목차
1. Introduction
2. English and Korean PPQs and NPQs
3. Literature review and critique
4. Current study
5. Results
6. Discussion
7. Conclusion
References
해당간행물 수록 논문
- How does GPT-4.1 comprehend conversational implicatures? Reasoning with contextual alternatives in discourse frames
- Can lower inhibitory control lead to better second language phonological contrast learning?
- Pre-service elementary and secondary teachers’ acceptance of AI-based ELT tools: Predictors of behavioral intention and group differences
- One possible direction for the puzzle of morphological acquisition in advanced second-language learners of English: Insights from Chinese and Japanese speakers
- Trends and patterns in self-assessment research in the Korean EFL context: A bibliometric study
- High vs. low negation in English NPQs: How Korean EFL and ESL learners diverge
- Comparing spoken discourse marker use in NS and NNS speech: A corpus-based study using ChatGPT
- Revisiting World Englishes through tag questions: Linguistic variation in Korean English
- Linguistic features of cognitive decline in aging adults
- Assessing L2 speaking in virtual worlds: Validity, mode effects, and implications for group oral proficiency testing
- A bibliometric comparison of grammatical development in spoken and sign languages: Thematic evolution and persistent keywords
참고문헌
- Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
- Developmental Psychology
- Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Studies in Chinese Linguistics
- Semantics and Pragmatics
- Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung
- Glossa
- Lingua
- Oxford
- Second Language Research
- Linguistics and Philosophy
- American Anthropologist
- Korean Journal of Linguistics
- Studia Linguistica
- Lingua
- Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America
- Applied Linguistics
- Linguistics and Philosophy
- McGill Working Papers in Linguistics
- Language Research
관련논문
인문학 > 언어학분야 BEST
- ChatGPT 기반 TOPIK 말하기 평가피드백 모형 개발 및 적용
- AI 기반 피드백의 교육적 활용 가능성 탐색
- 학문 목적 한국어 학습자를 위한한국어 교육과정 설계에서의 논점과 설계 근거
인문학 > 언어학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!