본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

가사소송법상 사전적 이행확보제도

이용수  12

영문명
The Provisional Remedies in the Family Litigation Act
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
김원태
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제27권 제2호, 237~292쪽, 전체 56쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2023.06.30
9,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In family cases, it generally takes long time for a judgment to be confirmed or for family mediation to take effect. The Family Litigation Act thus provides the preliminary order, provisional attachment, and provisional injunction systems in family litigation, family non-litigation, and family mediation to preserve the satisfaction of a latent judgment(or mediation). They are collectively called the Provisional Remedies. There are overlapping parts between the preliminary order systems and the provisional attachment and injunction system, but there are essential differences between them in requirements for application and hearing, which raises a need to review them according to the nature of a family case. This study set out to examine the unique nature and procedure of preliminary order, provisional attachment and injunction under the Family Litigation Act, and the major content of the revised bill by including the content of the revised bill as well as the current Act in its scope. The current Act has an issue of no effectiveness since preliminary order had no ability to be enforced even in the case of a strong need for emergency order. The revised bill adds a provision to grant power of execution to preliminary order. This issue must be solved fundamentally by a fast legislative measure. Caution should be taken not to postpone the issue of preliminary order as the future hearing practice of preliminary order places importance on the probability of citing the original bill(preserved right) for the reason of preliminary order's power of execution. The hearing of preliminary order should focus on the need for preservation. Both the current Act and its revised bill have no substantive enactment to allow a appeal against a decision to dismiss or reject a preliminary order application. The revised bill needs to be revised to include substantive enactment to allow the applicant to file an immediate appeal.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 사전처분의 특수성과 그 절차
Ⅲ. 가사소송법상 가압류・가처분
Ⅳ. 개정안의 주요 내용
Ⅴ. 맺는말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김원태. (2023).가사소송법상 사전적 이행확보제도. 민사소송, 27 (2), 237-292

MLA

김원태. "가사소송법상 사전적 이행확보제도." 민사소송, 27.2(2023): 237-292

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제