학술논문
보건의료 자원배분의 우선순위 설정기준 탐색
이용수 34
- 영문명
- Exploring Priority Setting Criteria for Limited Health Care Resources
- 발행기관
- 한국사회약학회 (구.한국보건사회약료경영학회)
- 저자명
- 배은영(Eun-Young Bae) 고민지(Minji Go) 배그린(Green Bae) 이보람(Bo Ram Lee) 임민경(Minkyeong Lim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『한국사회약학회지』제7권 제1호, 60~66쪽, 전체 7쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 기타의약학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2019.05.30
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the priority setting criteria that the public thinks appropriate for limited health care resources. METHODS Twelve adults who reside in Jinju were recruited for focus group interview. Participants were divided into two groups of six people each, and each discussion was moderated by the same researcher based on the same scenario. RESULTS As a result of the focus group interview in the two groups, we could identify various criteria involved in prioritizing limited health care resources. In general, accessibility to necessary medical services was considered a very important value, and it was important to guarantee access to basic medical care, equity in health care use, and support for socioeconomically vulnerable classes. It was also found that many participants considered protection from financial risks as a very important function of health insurance. However, participants were divided on how to allocate resources under the constraint of a limited budget. Some insisted that it was necessary to support the latest high-priced medical treatments as it is the obligation of the nation to protect the lives and health of people, while others insisted that it needs to be balanced considering both costs and benefits. CONCLUSION Overall, the results found that equity considerations are stronger than the support for the health maximization, which corresponds to the principle of utilitarian distribution. In addition, a big difference of opinions between generations was also discovered. Participants in their 20s, they paid more attention to cost-effectiveness than the other age group.
목차
서 론
연구방법(Methods)
연구결과(Results)
고찰 및 결론(Discussion & Conclusion)
감사의 말씀(Acknowledgement)
참고문헌 (References)
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
의약학 > 기타의약학분야 BEST
더보기의약학 > 기타의약학분야 NEW
- 약학회지 제69권 제3호(2025년) 목차
- 국내외 폐의약품의 수거 현황 비교 및 정책적 시사점 도출
- 성인 과체중 또는 비만 환자에서 GLP-1 수용체 작용제의 유효성 및 안전성 평가: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 베이지안 네트워크 메타분석
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
