비변호사 중재인 활용의 문제점과 개선방안

• 영문명: A Study on the Problems and Improvement Plan of Using of Non-Lawyer Arbitrator
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 안건형(Keon-Hyung Ahn)
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제25권 제1호, 47~64쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.03.30

영문 초록

Pursuant to Article 109(1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act of Korea, a person, not an attorney-at-law, who receives or promises to receive money, articles, entertainment or other benefits or who gives or promises to give those things to a third party, in compensation for providing or mediating legal services, such as examination, representation, arbitration(emphasis added), settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, making of legal documents, etc. shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than 7 years or by a fine not exceeding KRW 50 million or may be punished by both and there is no specific provision on qualification of arbitrator except on nationality of an arbitrator in the Arbitration Act of Korea. Then, the question arises, can any non-lawyer arbitrator who receives arbitrator’s fees be punished in accordance with the Attorney-at-Law Act in Korea? To search for an answer for this matter, this paper examines the Arbitration Act or the Civil Procedure Code of 33 major countries in the world and explains a research on the participation ratio of non-lawyer arbitrators in all 360 arbitration cases registered in 2012 at the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB).

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 중재인의 자격에 관한 판례 및 선행연구 검토

Ⅲ. 대한상사중재원의 중재인 선정 현황

Ⅳ. 중재인의 자격에 대한 국내외 법규 검토

Ⅴ. 결 론

키워드

한국 변호사법 제109조 중재인의 자격 대한상사중재원의 중재인 선정 현황에 대한 실태분석 일본 변호사법 제72조 한국 중재법 Article 109 of Attorney-at-Law Act of Korea Qualification of Arbitrator Analysis of Appointment of Arbitrators at the KCAB Article 72 of Attorney Act of Japan Arbitration Act of Korea