학술논문
등록상표와 주지ㆍ저명상표의 충돌
이용수 334
- 영문명
- The conflict between well-known trademarks and a registered trademark
- 발행기관
- 세창출판사
- 저자명
- 황다운(Hwang da woon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『창작과 권리』2016년 봄호 (제82호), 33~63쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2016.03.01
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
The conflict between the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act is caused by a dual protection of well-known and famous trademarks by the two laws. Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act in Korea confirms the principle of prior application of the Trademark Act and the supplementary status of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, while the Supreme Court's precedents incapacitate this article, citing the abuse of trademark rights in terms of legal principles, and put the Unfair Competition Prevention Act equal or superior to the Trademark Act.
Focusing on it, this study examines respective functions of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act and the Trademark Act and relations to each other, and analyzes leading cases related to the conflict between the two laws.
Concerning conflicts of rights between the Trademark Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, in particular, in exercising rights under the Trademark Act, the study shows that the Supreme Court excludes Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act in many decision cases, including target decisions, citing ‘misuse or abuse of the Trademark Act’.
Since such cases may harm legal stability by easily admitting abuse of rights under the Trademark Act without consistent criteria, efforts to maintain the intent of statutory provisions concerning the relations between the Trademark Law and the Unfair Competition Prevention Act are necessary.
Alternative measures, such as introduction of prior user rights, or deletion of Article 15 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act, can be considered, and options, such as allowing the registration to be nullified under the Trademark Act, as in the U.S. and Europe, if a trademark has been registered with any malicious intention, and making trademark rights invalid in case of any malicious trademark right exercises, can be reviewed for consideration.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 부정경쟁방지법과 상표법
Ⅲ. 주지ㆍ저명상표의 보호
Ⅳ. 등록상표와 주지ㆍ저명상표의 충돌
Ⅴ. 관련 판례
Ⅵ. 문제해결의 대안
Ⅶ. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 BEST
- 인공지능 판사, 과연 가능한가?
- 정치의 사법화와 사법의 정치화 : 온건하고 실용적인 헌법재판의 당위성
- 자국 우선주의 정책과 국제법상 난민⋅이민자 보호-트럼프 행정부의 미국 우선주의를 중심으로-
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
더보기최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
