성별영향분석평가 추진과정의 시민참여 활성화 방안

• 영문명: Strategies for Vitalization of Citizen Participation in the Process of Gender Impact Analysis and Assessment
• 발행기관: 한국여성정책연구원(구 한국여성개발원)
• 저자명: 최유진(Yoo Jin Choi) 유희정(Hee Jung Yoo) 문희영(Hee Young Moon)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국여성정책연구원 연구보고서』2014 연구보고서(수시과제) 11, 1~146쪽, 전체 145쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 여성학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.09.30

국문 초록

Ⅰ. 연구 개요 ○ 2011년 성별영향분석평가법('12.3월) 시행 이후 성별영향분석평가 제도운영의 기본 방식이 행정의 책무성을 강화하는 방향으로 점진적으로 전환되고 있음. 이에 더해 성 주류화 수단으로써 성별영향분석평가는 시민 참여를 통해 제도를 운영하여 성 평등 실효성과 여성 임파워먼트(empowerment)를 강화해야 한다는 문제제기와 새로운 시도들이 수행되고 있음. - 시민참여의 필요성에 대해서는 첫째, 행정 중심의 제도 운영의 불충분을 보완하기 위한 다양한 의견 수렴 방안의 일환으로 시민 의견 수렴을 제안하는 것과 둘째, 여성단체가 성별영향분석평가 전 과정에 참여해야 한다고 제안하는 것임. - 새로운 시도는 성별영향분석평가센터와 여성단체를 중심으로 성별영향 분석평가의 전 과정 또는 성 평등 조치사항의 정책 환류 성과에 대한 모니터링임. ○ 향후 성별영향분석평가 과정에 대한 시민참여 움직임이 확대될 것으로 예상되는 바, 본 연구는 성 주류화가 내포하고 있는 여성조직과 파트너십형성의 중요성과 함의에 근거하여 현재의 공식적인 제도 운영 체계의 내ㆍ외부 주체의 모니터링 참여 방안에 대해 제안하고자 함. ○ 본 연구의 제안은 첫째, 2014년 추진되고 있는 시민참여 정책 모니터링 추진 현황을 성별영향분석평가 단계별 과정과 추진 주체별 분석, 둘째, 지역시민의 성별영향분석평가 참여에 대한 제도화 수준 분석 그리고 모니터링 현장 참여와 관계자 면접을 통해 마련되었음.

영문 초록

This study attempts to find a significant implication of citizen participation in the process of gender impact analysis and assessment, which further develops monitoring index of citizen participation and monitoring methods. The project which promotes citizen participation is actually not based on the Gender Impact Analysis and Assessment Act. However, several ordinances enacted by local governments defined the basic rule for citizen participation such as citizen proposal or citizen's committee, and local centers for gender impact analysis and assessment (GIA) run their own citizen's committee. Ministry of gender equality and family has cooperated with women's organizations to monitor gender-sensitive policies. Furthermore, given that GIA is one of core factors to construct gender mainstreaming system, several pilot studies have been run by questioning on the implementation of GIA through gender governance. In the future, more active participation of citizens will be required "in the process of GIA." Relevant ordinances have been enacted based on the notion of significance of citizen participation. Thus, regarding monitoring activities by citizens, several issues should be carefully considered as follow. First, there is an issue on the objectives of citizen's monitoring. It is required to decide whether to check the performance in the framework of gender impact analysis system, or to assess the whole process or each steps based on gender-equality objectives in order to predict the system changes. Second, there is an issue on which objectives should be set and how the boundary of monitoring is decided. One way is to consider public administrations as the main agent of GIA. By doing so, it is possible to assess the report of GIA and to evaluate whether the policy implications and policy improvements are appropriate to draw gender-sensitive policies. The other is to provide suggestions for each steps of gender impact analysis (from the selection of projects to the feedback on policy improvement plans) and assessment and to find the best way of role sharing. As discussed so far, in terms of objectives and boundary of participation, citizen's monitoring committee is developed different from other organizations or formal institutions to support GIA, such as the chief office, project department, the centers for GIA (and consultant), and the committee of GIA. In addition to long-term plan for the objectives and boundary of monitoring, three issues should be taken into account. First, information of 'policy objects' should be able to easily collected and both human and material resources are properly considered. Second, regarding 'monitoring subjects,' linkage between regions, implementation by regions, collaboration among NGO, citizens, and experts should be examined. Third, the timing of monitoring (a series of projects and individual projects), application methods and supportive administration structure (promotion system, labor force, information infrastructure, budget) are also important factors to be considered. Therefore, it is possible to seek for monitoring strategies into two parts, performance checking and performance evaluation. First of all, performance checking is defined as the assessment of GIA in order to help the settlement of system in accordance with its initial purposes. Specifically, the following things should be assessed: how well operating objectives are achieved and how well policy improvement plans are implemented. Performance checking by citizen participation is to monitor whether public administrations follow a proper procedure of implementation, and whether they perform their duties to improve the system. As the current version of GIA aims to improve individual policies as the main goals, the field monitoring can investigate whether analysis results are effectively reflected in the actual policies. For example, based on local ordinances of GIA, it is possible to monitor the whole process of

목차

발간사

연구요약

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 성별영향분석평가와 시민참여

Ⅲ. 시민참여 모니터링 추진현황

Ⅳ. 성별영향분석평가 시민참여 방안

참고문헌

부록

Abstract