영국 빅토리아 여왕시대 소설에서 풍자.The Book of Satire in the Victorian Novel, by Frances Theresa Russell

Frances Theresa Russell 지음

뉴가출판사 2022년 03월 25일 출간

작품소개

책소개

영국 빅토리아 여왕시대 소설에서 풍자.The Book of Satire in the Victorian Novel,by Frances Theresa Russell

미국의 작가겸 교수가 쓴 책으로 1800년도 초반의 영국의 빅토리아 여왕시대의 소설에서의 풍자에 대해서 쓴책. 찰스디킨스는 이시대의 대표적인 사회 풍자를 그린 작품을 쓴 작가로서 올리버트위스트 두도시이야기 위대한유산 등. 이책은 목차및 본문의 내용처럼 여러부류의 풍자소설을 업급함.
Frances Theresa Elizabeth Peet Russell .May 18, 1873 ？ February 15, 1936. was an American author and professor. She wrote three books about English literature. Her book Satire in the Victorian Novel may have been the first work to analyze satire in Victorian literature.
풍자. Satire , 諷刺 .정치적 현실과 세상 풍조, 그외에 일반적으로 인간생활의 결함 ·악폐 ·불합리 ·우열 ·허위 등에 가해지는 기지 넘치는 비판적 조소적인 내용.

목차

영국 빅토리아 여왕시대 소설에서 풍자.The Book of Satire in the Victorian Novel, by Frances Theresa Russell

CONTENTS
PART I
PREMISES
CHAPTER I
THE SATIRIC SPIRIT


CHAPTER II
THE CONFLUENCE


PART II
METHODS
CHAPTER I
THE ROMANTIC


CHAPTER II
THE REALISTIC

CHAPTER III
THE IRONIC


PART III
OBJECTS
CHAPTER I
INDIVIDUALS

CHAPTER II
INSTITUTIONS


CHAPTER III
TYPES


PART IV
CONCLUSIONS
CHAPTER I
RELATIONSHIPS


CHAPTER II
THE VICTORIAN CONTRIBUTION


Bibliographical note 317

Index 329

책 속으로

영국 빅토리아 여왕시대 소설에서 풍자.The Book of Satire in the Victorian Novel,by Frances Theresa Russell

미국의 작가겸 교수가 쓴 책으로 1800년도 초반의 영국의 빅토리아 여왕시대의 소설에서의 풍자에 대해서 쓴책. 찰스디킨스는 이시대의 대표적인 사회 풍자를 그린 작품을 쓴 작가로서 올리버트위스트 두도시이야기 위대한유산 등. 이책은 목차및 본문의 내용처럼 여러부류의 풍자소설을 업급함.
Frances Theresa Elizabeth Peet Russell .May 18, 1873 ？ February 15, 1936. was an American author and professor. She wrote three books about English literature. Her book Satire in the Victorian Novel may have been the first work to analyze satire in Victorian literature.
풍자. Satire , 諷刺 .정치적 현실과 세상 풍조, 그외에 일반적으로 인간생활의 결함 ·악폐 ·불합리 ·우열 ·허위 등에 가해지는 기지 넘치는 비판적 조소적인 내용.

출판사 서평

영국 빅토리아 여왕시대 소설에서 풍자.The Book of Satire in the Victorian Novel, by Frances Theresa Russell

PREFACE
If the following monograph were to be presented from the point of view of a proponent, the author would be put triply on the defensive in relation to the theme. For, from one cause or another, the trio of terms in the title lies under a certain blight of critical opinion.
Satire, being a thistle “pricked from the thorny branches of reproof,” cannot expect to be cherished in the sensitive human bosom with the welcome accorded to the fair daffodil or the sweet violet. It must be content to be admired, if at all, from a safe distance, with the cold eye of intellectual appraisal.
Victorianism has the distinction of being the only period in literature whose very name savors of the byword and the reproach. To be an Elizabethan is to be envied for the gift of youthful exuberance and an exquisite joy in life. To be a Queen Annian (if the phrase may be adapted) is to be respected for the accomplishments of mature manhood,―a dignified mein, ripened judgment, and polished wit. To be a Victorian―that indeed provokes the question whether ’twere better to be or not to be. The chronological analogy cannot, however, be carried out, for the Victorian, whatever the cause of his unfortunate reputation, can hardly be accused of senility. On the contrary, the impression prevails that the startled ingenuousness, for instance, with which he opened his eyes at Darwin, Ibsen, and the iconoclasts in Higher Criticism; the vehemence with which he opposed and refuted and fulminated against everything hitherto undreampt[viii] of in his philosophy; the complacency with which he viewed himself and his achievements, were attributes more appropriate to adolescence than to any later time of life. Withal there was little of the grace and gayety of youth, and not much more of the poise and humor of manhood. That the Victorian was never at ease, in Zion or elsewhere, that he was prone to take himself and his disjointed times very seriously, without achieving a proportionate reformation, is a charge from which he never can be acquitted. To our modern authorities, especially such dictators as Shaw and Wells, contemplating him from the vantage ground of a higher rung in the ladder of civilization, the Victorian looks as Wordsworth did to Lady Blandish, like “a very superior donkey,” protected by the side-blinders of conventionality, saddled and bridled by authority, and ridden around in a circle by sentiment (most tyrannical of drivers), with much cracking of whip and raising of dust, but no real change of intellectual or spiritual locality. Nor can all the cavorting fun of Dickens, all the pungent playfulness of Thackeray, all the sardonic gibes of Carlyle, all the grotesque gesturing of Browning, all the winged irony of George Eliot and Matthew Arnold, not even all the quips and cranks in Punch itself, avail to quash the indictment. The Victorian may be defended, appreciated, exonerated even; he may in time succeed in living it down. But to live it down is not quite the same as to have had nothing that had to be lived down.

작가정보

저자(글) Frances Theresa Russell

Frances Theresa Russell .영국 빅토리아 여왕시대 소설에서 풍자.The Book of Satire in the Victorian Novel,by Frances Theresa Russell미국의 작가겸 교수.SATIRE IN THE VICTORIANNOVELBYFRANCES THERESA RUSSELL, PH.D.ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH, STANFORD UNIVERSITYSUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE FACULTY OF PHILOSOPHY, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITYNew YorkTHE MACMILLAN COMPANY1920All rights reservedCOPYRIGHT, 1920,BY THE MACMILLAN COMPANY.