예수의 부활復活 의 증거들. 변호인의 관점에서 본. The Book of The Proofs of Christ's Resurrection; from a Lawyer's Standpoint, by Charles R. Morrison

Charles R. Morrison 지음

뉴가출판사 2022년 03월 02일 출간

작품소개

책소개

예수의 부활復活 의 증거들. 변호인의 관점에서 본. The Book of The Proofs of Christ`s Resurrection; from a Lawyer`s Standpoint, by Charles R. Morrison

예수의 부활을 기독교의 변호인의 입장에서 본 증거들을 기록한책. 그 내용은 목차및 본문에서 확인합니다.


THE PROOFS
OF
CHRIST’S RESURRECTION;
FROM A LAWYER’S STANDPOINT.
BY
CHARLES R. MORRISON.
ANDOVER:
WARREN F. DRAPER.
1882

예수 그리스도의 부활은 기독교는 부활의 종교라 해도 과언이 아닐 만큼 그리스도의 부활 사건은 기독교 신앙의 근간을 이룸.
부활의 증거들과 부활 후의 목격자들은 예수님의 부활 사건 직후부터 부활을 불신하게 만드는 사탄의 노력이 계속되어 왔고 그분의 부활을 입증하는 증거들이 우리 앞에 있읍니다.이책에서는 그 증거를 알아보면 됩니다.

목차

예수의 부활復活 의 증거들. 변호인의 관점에서 본. The Book of The Proofs of Christ's Resurrection; from a Lawyer's Standpoint, by Charles R. Morrison

CONTENTS.
CHAPTER
PAGE
7
I. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE
II. ADMISSIONS AND PRESUMPTIONS 12
III. PAPIAS AND JUSTIN MARTYR 14
IV. THE MEMOIRS INTENDED BY JUSTIN MARTYR 18
V. QUOTATIONS AND CITATIONS 23
VI. JUSTIN’S USE OF THE FOURTH GOSPEL 30
VII. NO OTHERS PROVED 34
VIII. PRESUMPTION OF PERMANENCY 43
IX. THE MEMOIRS OF THE YEAR ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY 45
X. ASCENDING THE STREAM 50
XI. STILL ASCENDING THE STREAM 57
XII. IN THEIR PROPER REPOSITORIES 63
XIII. INTEGRITY OF THE GOSPELS 67
XIV. THE CREDIBILITY OF THE EVANGELISTS 74
XV. THE APOCALYPSE AND THE FOUR EPISTLES 81
XVI. HIS PREDICTIONS CONCERNING HIMSELF
89[6]
XVII. ORDER OF EVENTS 101
XVIII. SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROOFS 110
XIX. SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROOFS 120
XX. LOGICAL RESULTS 134
INDEX 143

출판사 서평

예수의 부활復活 의 증거들. 변호인의 관점에서 본. The Book of The Proofs of Christ's Resurrection; from a Lawyer's Standpoint, by Charles R. Morrison

PREFACE.
The present treatise is intended to give what the author has often felt the need of―a compact and thoroughly reliable statement of the principal historical facts to the authenticity and integrity of the New Testament writings concerning our Lord, and the presumptions from them which establish his claims as our Divine Redeemer and Saviour.
The question of his Resurrection from the dead is selected as the pivot, because everything hinges upon it. This question, whichever way it is determined, is decisive. It is a question which greatly concerns every one. It is a question of evidence, and as such is especially deserving of careful inquiry by members of the legal profession. For, as Prof. Greenleaf observed in his work hereafter cited,―“If a close examination of the evidences of Christianity may be expected of one class of men more than another, it would seem incumbent on us, who make the law of evidence one of our peculiar studies.”
As the question of Christ’s Resurrection is the objective point of our inquiries, all other questions are subordinated to it, and examined so far only as deemed material to the main question.
The author has availed himself of a lawyer’s privilege, and made use of the researches, arguments, and conclusions of others who may justly be regarded as authority, and to whom he has given credit as far as practicable, but has endeavored to form an independent judgment in view of all accessible sources of information.
[4]
The work is, in the main, as published in a series of articles in the
, from March 5,
, and also in the
1881, to April 1, 1882, which will explain the use of the common version in the earlier chapters and the New Revision in the later ones.
While the proofs have been marshalled around the principal fact, those to establish the subsidiary question of our Four Gospels and the Book of Acts have been largely centered upon the “Memoirs” mentioned in the confessedly genuine writings of Justin Martyr. Justin, in his First Apology, so called, written before the year one hundred and fifty of our era, and probably ten years earlier, has given a graphic account of the usages in the churches generally. In this account he says that, on the “day called Sunday,” Memoirs of Christ were read with the Prophets, in all their assemblies. Hence, when it is ascertained that these Memoirs were our Canonical Gospels, we make a long stride toward the conclusion of their undoubted authenticity and genuineness.
To all questions of evidence which arise, the author applies legal principles and presumptions derived from experience and constantly acted upon in courts of justice. He asks of the reader a patient perusal to the end, for he confidently believes that the vital fact of Christ’s Resurrection, with all the grand consequences which necessarily follow it,
is as susceptible of proof, from undoubted historical facts and solid argument, as any other event in history.
The work is written for busy men in all the walks of life, and the writer has endeavored to make himself understood.
CHARLES R. MORRISON.
MANCHESTER, N. H., August, 1882.

작가정보

저자(글) Charles R. Morrison

예수의 부활復活 의 증거들. 변호인의 관점에서 본. The Book of The Proofs of Christ's Resurrection; from a Lawyer's Standpoint, by Charles R. Morrison영미저술가THE PROOFSOFCHRIST’S RESURRECTION;FROM A LAWYER’S STANDPOINT.BYCHARLES R. MORRISON.ANDOVER:WARREN F. DRAPER.1882