미국 민사소송에서 소송비용의 재판에 대한 불복방법

• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 조수혜
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제15권 제1호, 242~279쪽, 전체 38쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.05.30

영문 초록

Despite costs shall be allowed to the prevailing party in principle, the court is vested with the discretion in awarding costs in some exceptional cases. However, it is prohibited to appeal from the judgment that regards costs only under the Civil Procedure Act of Korea, implying there are no methods to control the discretion of the court with regard to costs, while it may matter to parties. While the provision that denies the appealability of decisions regarding costs only has been attacked, its legitimacy has been confirmed by the two highest courts in Korea, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. Nonetheless, it would be desirable to consider the way to respect the right to appeal of parties, while securing the efficiency of the Judiciary. This paper employed a comparative methodology in studying the provision: The appealability of decisions regarding costs only in the U.S. courts has been researched to detect any implication to our system. Based on the comparison of the costs appealing system of Korea and the U.S., this paper makes some suggestions to promote the right to appeal, as well as the efficiency of the Judiciary.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말 - 문제의 제기

Ⅱ. 소송비용부담재판의 독립항소금지제도와 그 문제점

Ⅲ. 미국에 있어서 소송비용의 재판

Ⅳ. 미국의 소송비용의 재판에 대한 불복제도

Ⅴ. 비교법적 분석을 통한 제안

Ⅵ. 맺음말

참고문헌

키워드

소송비용 상환청구 가능한 소송비용 변호사 보수 승소 당사자 상소대상 적격성 판결의 종국성 costs taxable costs attorney s fees prevailing party appealability finality