판결의 반사적 효력에 관한 고찰

• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 정규상
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제15권 제1호, 425~451쪽, 전체 27쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2011.05.30

영문 초록

The approaches denying the reflective effect and expanding the scope of the res judicata effect are considered influential regarding the validity of the reflective effect at the present that the procedural law theory stays dominant about the essence of the res judicata. However, in cases which third parties are in dependent relationship with the parties in terms of substantive law, the reflective effect is considered effective in the light of the need for the coherent settlement of the related conflicts as well as the resolution of the conflict, which is the goal of civil litigation, under the premise of determination on the merits and impartiality. Although the case law does not expressly stipulate the effect of the reflective effect, there are cases as presented in the provided text in which the reflective effect is readily presumed as premises. I hence admit that it is basically appropriate to accept the validity of the reflective effect under strict conditions.

목차

Ⅰ. 서

Ⅱ. 민사소송법상 반사효개념의 정립경과

Ⅲ. 반사효인정여부에 관한 오늘날의 학설의 태도

Ⅳ. 반사효인정여부에 관한 일본판례의 태도

Ⅴ. 반사효인정여부에 관한 우리 판례의 태도

Ⅵ. 결 론

참고문헌

키워드

반사적 효력 법률요건적 효력 부수적 효력 기판력확장 실체법상 의존관계 the reflective effect the effect of prima facie case the incidental effect the expanding the scope of the res judicata effect the dependent relationship with the parties in terms of substantive law